Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Kenya decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Muntukei v Magana Holdings Limited & another [2025] KEELC 5244 (KLR)
The court struck out a review application against dismissal of a suit, holding it was filed under the wrong procedure and should have been brought under Order 17 rule 6.
Kehodo v Scangraphics Kenya Ltd [2025] KEELRC 2019 (KLR)
The court declined to stay execution or set aside warrants of attachment, holding the application lacked merit and that execution should proceed.
Migot v Otieno (Sued as the Legal Representative of the Estate of Jemima Akinyi Oyare, Deceased) [2025] KEELC 4847 (KLR)
The court set aside a dismissal for want of prosecution and reinstated the appeal, finding no record discrepancy but allowing the appellant another chance to show cause.
Chief Officer, Ministry of Social Services, Youth, Sport & Culture & another v Ndahugah Holdings Limited [2025] KEHC 8459 (KLR)
The High Court dismissed an appeal over execution steps against county government officers, holding that the notice to show cause did not breach the Government Proceedings Act.
Tome v Mosoiko & 2 others [2025] KEELC 4121 (KLR)
The court excused delay in filing the record of appeal, finding counsel at fault rather than the appellant, and granted time to file and serve it.
Maingi (Suing on Her Behalf and on Behalf of All and Representing for the Benefit of All Residents of Thange, Moki, Mbulutini, Mwanza, Nazavoni And Ngomano Villages in Kibwezi West Constituency, Makueni County and All Citizens Affected Downstream the Thange River and Athi River) v Kenya Pipeline Company & another [2025] KEELC 3929 (KLR)
The Environment and Land Court declined to reinstate a petition dismissed for want of prosecution, finding the dismissal regular, the delay inexcusable, and the suit duplicative.
Dakianga Distributors Ltd v Onkeo [2025] KEHC 7210 (KLR)
The court found that the application was fundamentally defective as it was drawn and filed by an advocate whose name had been struck off the roll, rendering the application void and of no legal effect. Additionally, the applicant failed to demonstrate any sufficient cause for the stay of execution or to set aside the warrants of arrest, as the notice to show cause was part of the lawful execution process and not an opportunity to contest the decretal sum, which had already been determined by the court. The court held that the applicant, having not appealed the judgment or the decretal sum, sh…
Source excerpt
Kericho Technical Institute v Finance Community Based Group & 3 others [2025] KEHC 5844 (KLR)
The High Court at Kericho dismissed an application to strike out documents filed by advocates alleged to be improperly on record, finding the firm was properly on record under Order 9 Rule 1 and estoppel applied.
Malombe v Mombasa Maize Millers (NBI) Limited [2025] KEELRC 1152 (KLR)
The court declined to set aside a dismissal for want of prosecution, finding the applicant had not shown sufficient cause for failing to respond to the notice to show cause.
In re SNA (Minor) [2025] KEHC 4595 (KLR)
The High Court allowed a family appeal, holding that a notice to show cause and execution steps were defective because no decree had been extracted and served.
Explore more
