Choi v Exotic Gates Limited; Owuor (Objector)
Choi v Exotic Gates Limited; Owuor (Objector) [2025] KEELC 4536 (KLR)
The court found that the law firm of Onyango Ndolo & Company Advocates did not require leave to come on record for the Objector, as the Objector was a new party in post-judgment proceedings. The failure to file a notice of objection under Order 22 Rule 51 was not fatal since the Decree Holder was made aware of the Objector's claim through the application, and no prejudice was suffered. The consent order of 7th March, 2024 was validly entered into by counsel properly on record for the Judgment Debtor, and there was no evidence of fraud, collusion, or lack of authority. The default clause in th…
Source excerpt
- Execution Of Decrees
- Objection Proceedings
- Lifting Corporate Veil
- Consent Judgments
- Attachment Of Property