Sign in
Kenya Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Kenya Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Kenya decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family And Children [2025] KEHC 10303 (KLR)

In re Estate of Esinas Angunzuzu Kalega alias Asenath Angunzuzu Khalekha (Deceased)

In re Estate of Esinas Angunzuzu Kalega alias Asenath Angunzuzu Khalekha (Deceased) [2025] KEHC 10303 (KLR)

The High Court determined that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the Objector's Summons for Revocation of Grant because the original succession cause was properly before the magistrate's court, which had the requisite pecuniary jurisdiction. The Objector should have sought revocation in the trial court or appealed any adverse decision to the High Court. The High Court's jurisdiction is limited to appeals or matters where the lower court lacks jurisdiction. Since the application was not an appeal and the magistrate's court had jurisdiction, the High Court could not proceed. The court further…

  • Revocation Of Grant
  • Probate And Administration
  • Jurisdiction Of High Court
  • Pecuniary Jurisdiction
  • Fraud In Succession
  • Procedure For Succession Disputes
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] KEHC 10055 (KLR)

Ombi Rubber Rollers Limited v Wef Logistics Limited

Ombi Rubber Rollers Limited v Wef Logistics Limited [2025] KEHC 10055 (KLR)

The High Court dismissed an application to transfer a Small Claims Court suit so the applicant could file a counterclaim exceeding that court’s Kshs. 1 million limit.

  • Pecuniary Jurisdiction
  • Transfer Of Suits
  • Counterclaims
  • Small Claims Court Procedure
  • Small-claims-court
  • Pecuniary-jurisdiction
Read case analysis
Employment And Labour [2025] KEELRC 2079 (KLR)

Eldotec Consultancy Services Ltd v Adhiambo & 5 others

Eldotec Consultancy Services Ltd v Adhiambo & 5 others [2025] KEELRC 2079 (KLR)

The court found that the trial magistrate erred in failing to certify the appellant's applications as urgent, given the risk of dissipation of funds and the clear evidence of overpayment. However, the substantive claims for refund were determined based on the test suit, where it was established that the 1st respondents had received and utilized excess terminal dues, making them liable to refund the appellant. The 2nd respondents (financial institutions) were not liable as they no longer held the funds at the time of service of freezing orders. The court adopted the findings of the test suit a…

  • Terminal Dues
  • Erroneous Payment
  • Recovery Of Overpayment
  • Pecuniary Jurisdiction
  • Interim Injunctions
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] KEHC 9465 (KLR)

Helasabili Mobile Capital Limited v Chameleon Solutions Limited

Helasabili Mobile Capital Limited v Chameleon Solutions Limited [2025] KEHC 9465 (KLR)

The High Court held that it cannot transfer a suit from the Small Claims Court to the Magistrates Court where the Small Claims Court lacks jurisdiction due to the value of the counterclaim. The applicant, by expressly waiving recovery of sums above Kshs. 1,000,000 in its counterclaim, invoked Rule 14 of the Small Claims Court Rules and thereby limited the court's jurisdiction to the statutory maximum. The law is settled that a suit filed in a court without jurisdiction is incompetent and cannot be transferred to a court with jurisdiction; it must be struck out or withdrawn. The court cited bi…

  • Transfer Of Suits
  • Pecuniary Jurisdiction
  • Counterclaims
  • Small Claims Court Procedure
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] KEHC 9618 (KLR)

Jamarat Apartments Limited v Mandera County Government

Jamarat Apartments Limited v Mandera County Government [2025] KEHC 9618 (KLR)

The High Court held that the Mandera Principal Magistrate’s Court lacked pecuniary jurisdiction over a claim exceeding Kshs. 10 million, so the suit was properly filed in Garissa.

  • Pecuniary Jurisdiction
  • Territorial Jurisdiction
  • Transfer Of Suit
  • Magistrates Courts Act
  • Preliminary Objection
  • Pecuniary-jurisdiction
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2025] KEHC 9055 (KLR)

In re Estate of Edward Tale Nabangi (Deceased)

In re Estate of Edward Tale Nabangi (Deceased) [2025] KEHC 9055 (KLR)

The High Court dismissed an application to revoke a succession grant and transfer a cause, finding no proof of pecuniary lack of jurisdiction and no locus standi.

  • Locus Standi In Succession
  • Revocation Of Grant
  • Pecuniary Jurisdiction
  • Transfer Of Succession Cause
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Succession-law
Read case analysis
Employment And Labour [2025] KEELRC 1849 (KLR)

Kenya Union of Domestic Hotels Educational Institutions and Hospital Workers (KUDHEIHA) v Kombanira & another

Kenya Union of Domestic Hotels Educational Institutions and Hospital Workers (KUDHEIHA) v Kombanira & another [2025] KEELRC 1849 (KLR)

The ELRC at Mombasa dismissed preliminary objections on pecuniary and territorial jurisdiction, holding the claim was a trade dispute and the court had original jurisdiction.

  • Jurisdiction Of Courts
  • Trade Disputes
  • Pecuniary Jurisdiction
  • Territorial Jurisdiction
  • Employment Contracts
  • Union Representation
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] KEELC 4741 (KLR)

Chumo (Suing as Legal Representative of the Estate of the Late Kipsigei Arap Cheplel alias Elijah Kipsigei Cheplel) v Chumo

Chumo (Suing as Legal Representative of the Estate of the Late Kipsigei Arap Cheplel alias Elijah Kipsigei Cheplel) v Chumo [2025] KEELC 4741 (KLR)

The court found that although there are two suits pending between the same parties over the same subject matter, the earlier suit (Kericho CM ELC Case No. 003 of 2018) was filed in a court lacking pecuniary jurisdiction, as the value of the subject property exceeds the Magistrate's Court's jurisdiction. The doctrine of sub judice, as codified in Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act and interpreted by the Supreme Court, only applies where both suits are pending before courts of competent jurisdiction. Since the lower court lacks jurisdiction, the existence of that suit does not render the pres…

  • Sub Judice
  • Jurisdiction
  • Striking Out Suit
  • Pecuniary Jurisdiction
  • Abuse Of Process
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] KEHC 9189 (KLR)

Diamond Trust Bank Kenya Limited v Thuranira

Diamond Trust Bank Kenya Limited v Thuranira [2025] KEHC 9189 (KLR)

The High Court determined that it has the statutory power to transfer suits to subordinate courts where the subject matter falls within the subordinate court's pecuniary jurisdiction. The Applicant's claim, being for Kshs. 2,490,416.30, is well within the Chief Magistrate's Court's jurisdictional limit of Kshs. 20,000,000. The Court found that judicial policy and the law favour the filing of matters in the lowest competent court to promote efficiency and access to justice. There was no evidence of prejudice to the Respondent, and the draft Plaint disclosed triable issues. Accordingly, the Cou…

  • Transfer Of Suits
  • Pecuniary Jurisdiction
  • Loan Agreements
  • Court Jurisdiction
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] KEELC 4842 (KLR)

Kinuthia v Montina & 4 others

Kinuthia v Montina & 4 others [2025] KEELC 4842 (KLR)

The court found that both the present suit and MCELC E163 of 2024 involve the same parties and the same subject matter, namely ownership of parcel Kajiado/Ntashart/2107. The present suit was filed first in time. Applying Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act and the Supreme Court's guidance in Kenya National Commission on Human Rights v Attorney General, the court held that the doctrine of sub-judice is satisfied. The subsequent suit in the Lower Court should be stayed to prevent conflicting decisions and abuse of process. The court further held that questions of pecuniary jurisdiction should…

  • Sub Judice
  • Stay Of Proceedings
  • Pecuniary Jurisdiction
  • Ownership Dispute
  • Abuse Of Process
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Kenya decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.