Lokai v Republic
Lokai v Republic [2025] KEHC 10628 (KLR)
The High Court found that the clerical error in citing the Alcoholic Drinks Control Act as No. 4 of 2020 instead of 2010 was inconsequential and did not prejudice the applicant. The use of descriptive terms such as 'illicit brew', 'chang’aa', and 'kanyara' in the charge sheet did not render it defective, as the Act defines alcoholic drinks broadly and does not require specific brands to be listed. The applicant understood the charges and suffered no prejudice. The plea was unequivocal, and the trial was fair. On sentencing, although the applicant was a repeat offender, the law provides for an…
Source excerpt
- Defective Charge Sheet
- Fair Trial Rights
- Sentencing Discretion
- Alcoholic Drinks Control
- Plea Equivocality