Murimi v Macharia & 3 others
Murimi v Macharia & 3 others [2025] KEHC 9831 (KLR)
The High Court found that the trial magistrate erred in dismissing the Appellant's claim for special damages on the basis that the receipts were exaggerated or manufactured, as there was no evidence or challenge from the Respondents to support such a conclusion. The court held that the Appellant had specifically pleaded and strictly proved special damages for motor vehicle repairs and related expenses through documentary evidence, and the absence of ETR receipts did not invalidate the claim. The trial court's reliance on extraneous matters and failure to recognize the effect of interlocutory…
Source excerpt
- Special Damages
- Road Traffic Accidents
- Burden Of Proof
- Pleadings And Evidence