Republic v Vitalis
Republic v Vitalis (Criminal Case E508 of 2025) [2026] KEMC 428 (KLR) (6 August 2026) (Sentence)
The court held that although the accused showed remorse, his status as a repeat offender who had previously received probation and reoffended meant a further non-custodial sentence was unsuitable. A custodial sentence was therefore warranted, but the court was obliged to credit the period already spent in lawful custody under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Source excerpt
- Suspected stolen property
- Custodial sentence
- Mitigation
- Pre-sentence report
- Repeat offender
- Section 333(2) criminal procedure code