Nyagudi v Ochieng
Nyagudi v Ochieng [2025] KEMC 142 (KLR)
The court found that the defendant published statements on social media that directly referred to the plaintiff and, in their ordinary meaning, portrayed him as corrupt and unfit for public office. The defendant admitted to making the publication, negating his challenge on evidentiary grounds. The statements were not protected as fair comment or public interest, as the defendant failed to demonstrate adherence to the criteria for such defences and did not verify the truth of his allegations. The defendant's evidence, including a newspaper cutting, did not mention the plaintiff or substantiate…
Source excerpt
- Defamation
- Libel
- Social Media Publication
- Damages For Reputation
- Public Interest Defence
- Burden Of Proof