Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Kenya decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Masika v Republic [2025] KECA 478 (KLR)
The Court of Appeal upheld a rape conviction and 49-year sentence, finding identification evidence reliable despite defects in the parade and no basis for the alibi claim.
Kipaa v Republic [2024] KEHC 9669 (KLR)
The High Court found that the trial was conducted by more than one magistrate, and the succeeding magistrate did not inform the appellant of his right under section 200(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code to have witnesses recalled and reheard. This omission was a violation of a mandatory procedural safeguard designed to protect the accused's right to a fair trial. The court held that the duty to inform the accused is not discretionary and must be observed regardless of whether the accused is represented by counsel. However, rather than quashing the conviction and setting the appellant free, th…
Source excerpt
Orina v Republic [2024] KEHC 1974 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant was charged and convicted under the wrong statutory provisions, rendering the charge sheet defective and the conviction unsustainable. The trial court's substitution of the charge to another provision of the law was also erroneous, as the correct offence for sexual acts with a person with mental disability is provided for under the Penal Code, not the Sexual Offences Act. Furthermore, the complainant was never presented in court for testimony, depriving the appellant of the right to cross-examine her and undermining the fairness of the trial. The court held…
Source excerpt
Emmanuel Odhiambo Ogwel v Republic [2021] KEHC 9507 (KLR)
The court held that although the Sexual Offences Act prescribes a mandatory minimum sentence of ten years for rape, recent jurisprudence from the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal has established that mandatory minimum sentences may be unconstitutional unless circumstances justify their imposition. The trial court did not have material to justify enhancement of the minimum sentence, and the prosecution did not urge for a higher sentence. The appellant was a first offender, expressed remorse, and withdrew his appeal against conviction, saving judicial time. Applying the principles from Francis…
Source excerpt
Kennedy Babu Kairu v Republic [2020] KECA 460 (KLR)
The Court of Appeal found that the trial and first appellate courts erred in several critical respects: (1) the trial court improperly relied on evidence and demeanor assessments from proceedings that were rendered void by the order for a de novo hearing, contrary to established legal principles; (2) the prosecution failed to call key witnesses, including the investigating officer and the doctor from Nairobi Women’s Hospital, and failed to produce crucial exhibits, thereby undermining the evidentiary basis for conviction; (3) the appellant's sworn defence was not challenged by cross-examinati…
Source excerpt
Paul Mwajoto Rai v Republic [2020] KEHC 1421 (KLR)
The court found that while the appellant's guilty plea and mitigation warranted some leniency, the gravity of the offence—rape of an 81-year-old woman—justified a severe sentence. The trial court had considered the appellant's mitigation, but the appellate court determined that a sentence of 25 years imprisonment, rather than 30, was appropriate given the circumstances. The court also ordered that the sentence run from the date the appellant was first arraigned, in accordance with Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The appeal was allowed only to the extent of reducing the sentence…
Source excerpt
David Mwangi Kamau v Republic [2019] KEHC 1676 (KLR)
The High Court resentenced the applicant after Muruatetu, imposing 20 years for each robbery with violence count and 10 years for each rape count, to run concurrently.
David Kang’ethe v Republic [2019] KEHC 1438 (KLR)
High Court appeal in a rape and assault case: the appellant challenged sentence only, and the court reduced the custodial sentence after considering custody time under section 333(2).
Said Abass Ali v Republic [2018] KEHC 4073 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt, primarily due to the lack of clear and reliable identification evidence linking the appellant to the offences. The complainant did not provide any description of the attacker, and the circumstances of the appellant's arrest were not clarified by the testimony of the arresting officers or any direct evidence. The evidence presented was largely hearsay and did not establish the appellant's identity as the perpetrator. The trial magistrate erred in convicting the appellant in the absence of positi…
Source excerpt
Joseph Ndai Chege v Republic [2017] KEHC 344 (KLR)
The High Court allowed a rape appeal, finding the prosecution had not proved penetration, identity, or lack of consent beyond reasonable doubt.
Explore more
