KKN v CNG
KKN v CNG [2024] KEHC 14592 (KLR)
The court found that the properties in question were acquired during the subsistence of the marriage and thus qualified as matrimonial property under the Matrimonial Property Act. Both parties made monetary and non-monetary contributions to their acquisition and development. The Applicant's evidence was uncontested, as the Respondent failed to file a competent affidavit or submissions. The court applied the statutory presumption of equal beneficial interest in matrimonial property acquired during marriage, holding that each party was entitled to a 50% share in the suit properties and, where a…
Source excerpt
- Matrimonial Property
- Division Of Property
- Beneficial Interest
- Rental Income Sharing