Garama v Karisa & 3 others
Garama v Karisa & 3 others [2024] KESC 45 (KLR)
The Supreme Court held that the application for review did not meet the exceptional circumstances required under Section 21A of the Supreme Court Act and Rule 28(5) of the Supreme Court Rules. The Court found that the applicant's grounds merely replicated arguments already canvassed and determined in the main judgment, and that no fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, or other qualifying ground for review was established. The Court reaffirmed its earlier analysis of the disjunctive test under Section 83 of the Elections Act, the standard of proof in election petitions, and the finality of polling…
Source excerpt
- Review Of Supreme Court Decisions
- Election Disputes
- Burden Of Proof In Election Petitions
- Scrutiny Of Votes
- Standard Of Proof
- Misrepresentation Of Facts