Sign in
Kenya Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Kenya Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Kenya decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family And Children [2025] KEHC 10456 (KLR)

RPB v SPK

RPB v SPK [2025] KEHC 10456 (KLR)

The High Court granted a conditional stay of execution pending appeal, requiring the applicant to deposit KES 2,610,000 as security and to prosecute the appeal.

  • Alimony Orders
  • Stay Of Execution
  • Maintenance Pending Appeal
  • Security For Decree
  • Stay-of-execution
  • Maintenance-orders
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] KEHC 10525 (KLR)

Ndegwa v Amollo & 3 others

Ndegwa v Amollo & 3 others [2025] KEHC 10525 (KLR)

The High Court granted a conditional stay of execution pending appeal, requiring deposit of half the decretal sums within 21 days. Proceedings in the related test-suit matters were not stayed.

  • Stay Of Execution
  • Appeals Process
  • Security For Decree
  • Substantial Loss
  • Test Suit Liability
  • Stay-of-execution
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] KEHC 10315 (KLR)

Mugambi & another v Nzioka

Mugambi & another v Nzioka [2025] KEHC 10315 (KLR)

The High Court at Meru dismissed an application to review and vary a stay condition, holding that no basis for review was shown and a declaratory suit against an insurer did not bar execution.

  • Stay Of Execution
  • Review Of Orders
  • Security For Decree
  • Declaratory Suit
  • Judgment Debtor Liability
  • Stay-of-execution
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] KEELC 4990 (KLR)

Reli Savings and Credit Co-operative Society Limited v Sinohydro Corporation Limited

Reli Savings and Credit Co-operative Society Limited v Sinohydro Corporation Limited [2025] KEELC 4990 (KLR)

The court allowed a stay application in part, releasing Kshs. 50 million to the plaintiff and staying execution for the Kshs. 80 million balance pending appeal.

  • Stay Of Execution
  • Trespass To Land
  • Damages Assessment
  • Security For Decree
  • Stay-of-execution
  • Civil-procedure
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] KEHC 9530 (KLR)

Eleete Interiors Limited v Stanbic Bank Kenya Limited

Eleete Interiors Limited v Stanbic Bank Kenya Limited [2025] KEHC 9530 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had not conclusively demonstrated substantial loss but, guided by the overriding objective and the need to balance the interests of both parties, exercised its discretion to grant a conditional stay of execution. The court held that the applicant must pay half of the decretal sum to the respondent and deposit the balance in a joint interest-earning account or provide a bank guarantee for the balance. Failure to comply with these conditions within 30 days would result in automatic dismissal of the application. The court emphasized that the principles under Or…

  • Stay Of Execution
  • Asset Financing
  • Loan Default
  • Security For Decree
  • Substantial Loss
  • Movable Property Security
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] KEHC 9174 (KLR)

Abdullahi v Medina Bus Services Limited & another

Abdullahi v Medina Bus Services Limited & another [2025] KEHC 9174 (KLR)

High Court at Machakos partly granted a stay of execution pending appeal, but declined to stay related proceedings in other cases.

  • Stay Of Execution
  • Stay Of Proceedings
  • Substantial Loss
  • Security For Decree
  • Stay-of-execution
  • Stay-of-proceedings
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] KEHC 9547 (KLR)

Kilonzo v Ndithya & another (Suing as Administrators of the Estate of the Late Faith Kaidi Ndithya (Deceased))

Kilonzo v Ndithya & another (Suing as Administrators of the Estate of the Late Faith Kaidi Ndithya (Deceased)) [2025] KEHC 9547 (KLR)

The High Court granted leave to appeal out of time and stay of execution, on terms including partial payment, deposit of the balance, and costs.

  • Stay Of Execution
  • Leave To Appeal Out Of Time
  • Extension Of Time
  • Security For Decree
  • Stay-of-execution
  • Leave-to-appeal-out-of-time
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] KEHC 8826 (KLR)

Platinum Credit Limited v Malia

Platinum Credit Limited v Malia [2025] KEHC 8826 (KLR)

The High Court discharged a stay of execution after the decretal sum was fully paid and ordered release of the security deposit to the appellant.

  • Stay Of Execution
  • Security For Decree
  • Release Of Deposit
  • Execution Of Judgment
  • Stay-of-execution
  • Security-for-decree
Read case analysis
Employment And Labour [2025] KEELRC 1842 (KLR)

Scott Bowerbank Day v Victory Farms Limited

Scott Bowerbank Day v Victory Farms Limited [2025] KEELRC 1842 (KLR)

The court held that while the applicant demonstrated substantial loss by raising reasonable apprehension about recovering the decretal sum if paid out and the appeal succeeded, the applicant failed to satisfy the mandatory requirement of providing security for the due performance of the decree as stipulated under Order 42 Rule 6(2)(b) of the Civil Procedure Rules. The court emphasized that the provision of security is not discretionary but compulsory, and the applicant's reliance on maintaining the status quo was insufficient. The absence of any offer or deposit of security rendered the appli…

  • Stay Of Execution
  • Security For Decree
  • Unfair Termination
  • Redundancy
  • Management Incentive
  • Substantial Loss
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] KEHC 8296 (KLR)

Meso & another (Suing as Representatives of the Estate of Boaz Wafula Meso , 1st Deceased and Monica Akinyi Meso, 2nd Deceased) v City Hopper Limited

Meso & another (Suing as Representatives of the Estate of Boaz Wafula Meso , 1st Deceased and Monica Akinyi Meso, 2nd Deceased) v City Hopper Limited [2025] KEHC 8296 (KLR)

The court found that the Applicant had expressed a reasonable apprehension that it would suffer substantial loss if stay was denied, given the large decretal sum and the Respondents' failure to demonstrate their ability to refund the amount if the appeal succeeded. The court held that the burden to prove means shifted to the Respondents, who did not discharge it. The court also found that the moratorium on Invesco Assurance Co. Ltd had expired and was not a valid ground for stay. Although there was some delay in filing the application, it was not so inordinate as to prejudice the Respondents,…

  • Stay Of Execution
  • Substantial Loss
  • Security For Decree
  • Motor Vehicle Accident
  • Appeal Procedure
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Kenya decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.