Kiarie & another v Ngutuku
Kiarie & another v Ngutuku [2025] KEELC 5111 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent had been in continuous, open, and uninterrupted occupation of the suit property since 2003, a period exceeding the statutory 12 years required for adverse possession. The appellants, despite being registered proprietors through succession, failed to demonstrate that the respondent's occupation was permissive or interrupted, and did not prove fraud or illegality in the respondent's claim. The evidence, including admissions by the appellants and corroboration by witnesses, established that the respondent's possession was adverse to the appellants' title. The…
Source excerpt
- Adverse Possession
- Land Registration
- Overriding Interests
- Limitation Of Actions
- Succession Of Land
- Title Extinguishment