Sign in
Kenya Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Kenya Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Kenya decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2025] KEHC 6146 (KLR)

Mwatha v Karanja

Mwatha v Karanja [2025] KEHC 6146 (KLR)

The High Court dismissed an application for stay of execution pending appeal, finding unexplained delay and no offer of security, though substantial loss was shown.

  • Stay Of Execution
  • Order 42 Rule 6
  • Substantial Loss
  • Security For Due Performance
  • Unreasonable Delay
  • Stay-of-execution
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] KEHC 4784 (KLR)

Volex General Motors (K) Limited v Ukhevi

Volex General Motors (K) Limited v Ukhevi [2025] KEHC 4784 (KLR)

High Court dismissed an application for stay of execution pending appeal, finding a 23-month delay unexplained and the claim of substantial loss unproven.

  • Stay Of Execution
  • Substantial Loss
  • Security For Due Performance
  • Unreasonable Delay
  • Stay-of-execution
  • Substantial-loss
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] KEHC 1381 (KLR)

Diamond Shipping Services Limited v Kencott CFS & 3 others

Diamond Shipping Services Limited v Kencott CFS & 3 others [2025] KEHC 1381 (KLR)

The High Court in Mombasa dismissed an application for stay of execution pending appeal, finding a ten-month delay was unreasonable and unexplained.

  • Stay Of Execution
  • Appeals Process
  • Unreasonable Delay
  • Security For Decretal Sum
  • Stay-of-execution
  • Civil-appeal
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] KEHC 13746 (KLR)

Muli v Kive

Muli v Kive [2024] KEHC 13746 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant demonstrated substantial loss due to the imminent threat of execution, as the respondent had already initiated execution proceedings. However, the court noted that there was undue delay in filing the application for stay, as the application was filed several months after the judgment. The applicant's willingness to deposit the entire decretal sum in a joint interest earning account was considered a mark of good faith and satisfied the requirement for security. Balancing the interests of both parties, the court exercised its discretion to grant a conditional…

  • Stay Of Execution
  • Security For Decretal Sum
  • Substantial Loss
  • Unreasonable Delay
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] KEELC 6068 (KLR)

Odula v Wasianju

Odula v Wasianju [2024] KEELC 6068 (KLR)

The court found that the application for stay of execution was filed 28 days after the judgment without any explanation, constituting unreasonable delay. The applicant failed to demonstrate any specific facts or factors that would amount to substantial loss if stay was not granted, merely making general assertions of irreparable loss and prejudice. Furthermore, the applicant did not offer any security for the due performance of the decree as required by law. As all three mandatory conditions for the grant of stay of execution pending appeal were not satisfied, the application was found to be…

  • Stay Of Execution
  • Substantial Loss
  • Security For Due Performance
  • Unreasonable Delay
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] KEELC 4988 (KLR)

Baudry v Kiraya

Baudry v Kiraya [2024] KEELC 4988 (KLR)

The Environment and Land Court at Nakuru dismissed a request for stay of execution pending appeal, finding unexplained delay, no proved substantial loss, and no security offered.

  • Stay Of Execution
  • Easements
  • Substantial Loss
  • Security For Due Performance
  • Unreasonable Delay
  • Stay-of-execution
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] KEHC 2813 (KLR)

Oagare v Bank of Africa Kenya Limited & another

Oagare v Bank of Africa Kenya Limited & another [2024] KEHC 2813 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to satisfy the mandatory requirements for stay of execution pending appeal under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Specifically, the applicant did not demonstrate that he would suffer substantial loss if stay was not granted, as the decree was a money decree and the respondent, a reputable bank, was capable of refunding the decretal sum if the appeal succeeded. The court also found that the application was filed with unreasonable delay, two months after judgment, without adequate explanation for the delay. Furthermore, the applicant did no…

  • Stay Of Execution
  • Loan Default
  • Security For Due Performance
  • Valuation Of Security
  • Substantial Loss
  • Unreasonable Delay
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] KEELC 20001 (KLR)

Kirui v Kipkurgat

Kirui v Kipkurgat [2023] KEELC 20001 (KLR)

The court dismissed an application for stay of execution pending appeal for failure to show substantial loss, unexplained delay, and lack of security.

  • Stay Of Execution
  • Substantial Loss
  • Security For Costs
  • Unreasonable Delay
  • Appeals
  • Transfer Of Land
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2023] KEHC 20751 (KLR)

Republic v Wefofwa

Republic v Wefofwa [2023] KEHC 20751 (KLR)

The High Court at Eldoret quashed murder proceedings and acquitted the accused after finding an inordinate, unexplained prosecution delay that violated the right to a fair trial.

  • Right To Fair Trial
  • Unreasonable Delay
  • Presumption Of Innocence
  • Acquittal Procedure
  • Fair-trial
  • Unreasonable-delay
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2023] KEHC 19631 (KLR)

Njiiri v Director of Public Prosecutions & another; Kenya Airways (Interested Party)

Njiiri v Director of Public Prosecutions & another; Kenya Airways (Interested Party) [2023] KEHC 19631 (KLR)

The High Court dismissed a constitutional petition alleging unreasonable trial delay and improper withdrawal of charges against a co-accused in a criminal case.

  • Right To Fair Trial
  • Unreasonable Delay
  • Prosecutorial Discretion
  • Withdrawal Of Charges
  • Abuse Of Process
  • Fair-trial-rights
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Kenya decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.