Ratsoane v Pact Lesotho (LC 74 of 2013) [2015] LSLC 52 (10 August 2015)
The respondent failed to follow the required fair procedure for dismissal based on operational requirements, as there was no genuine consultation or joint problem-solving with the applicant. The dismissal was therefore procedurally unfair and the applicant is entitled to compensation for the period she was unemployed and for the salary difference until the end of her contract.
- Citation
- [2015] LSLC 52
- Parties
- Applicant: Boithatelo Ratsoane; Respondent: PACT Lesotho
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2015
- Case Number
- LC 74 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Unfair Dismissal Claim / Judgment
- Outcome
- claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Retrenchment, Procedural Fairness, Compensation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Boithatelo Ratsoane
Applicant
PACT Lesotho
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Unfair Dismissal Claim / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dismissal of the applicant was procedurally fair under operational requirements
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to compensation for the remainder of her contract
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent failed to follow the required fair procedure for dismissal based on operational requirements, as there was no genuine consultation or joint problem-solving with the applicant. The dismissal was therefore procedurally unfair and the applicant is entitled to compensation for the period she was unemployed and for the salary difference until the end of her contract.
Court Disposition
claim allowed
Orders
- The dismissal of the applicant is declared unfair.
- Respondent to pay applicant compensation of M145,105 within 30 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment