Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Lesotho decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Maema v The Rosehip Company (LC 28 of 2015) [2015] LSLC 50 (31 August 2015)
The Labour Court of Lesotho found an employee’s retrenchment unfair, rejected an unauthorised postponement request, and awarded compensation, notice pay, and severance.
Ratsoane v Pact Lesotho (LC 74 of 2013) [2015] LSLC 52 (10 August 2015)
The Labour Court of Lesotho found Ratsoane’s retrenchment procedurally unfair and awarded compensation of M145,105, with no order as to costs.
Mokuena v Stallion Security (LC 47 of 2012) [2015] LSLC 51 (10 August 2015)
The Labour Court of Lesotho held that Bokang Mokuena’s dismissal by Stallion Security for operational reasons was both substantively and procedurally unfair.
Makatsela v Econet Telecom Lesotho (LC 23 of 2011) [2015] LSLC 48 (10 August 2015)
The Labour Court of Lesotho held that Makatsela’s retrenchment was fair, but ordered Econet-Telecom Lesotho to pay unpaid pension benefits.
Thite v Mineworkers Development Agency (LC 20 of 2013) [2015] LSLC 46 (10 August 2015)
The Labour Court of Lesotho held that Thite’s retrenchment was unfair, finding he was effectively permanent, was not properly consulted, and awarded compensation.
Makhooane and Others v Jikelele Services (Pty) Ltd (LC 41 of 2013) [2015] LSLC 26 (11 May 2015)
The Labour Court of Lesotho found the applicants’ retrenchments procedurally unfair because they were not directly consulted, and awarded each M27,000.
Semakaleng Liphapang and Others v Legal Voice (Pty) Ltd (LC 7 of 13) [2014] LSLC 3 (18 March 2014)
The Labour Court dismissed an unfair dismissal claim after finding the originating application was not signed by the applicants, as required by Rule 3.
Shahid Hassam and Others v Legal Voice (Pty) Ltd (LC 7 of 13) [2013] LSLC 38 (23 September 2013)
The Labour Court of Lesotho held that the first applicant was misjoined because his retrenchment claim and unpaid monies claims were distinct and independent.
Mpota v Standard Lesotho Bank (LAC/CIV/A 10 of 8) [2011] LSLAC 8 (1 July 2011)
The Labour Appeal Court of Lesotho held that inadequate notice made the retrenchment procedurally unfair and awarded compensation equal to ten months’ salary.
Phethang Mpota v Standard Lesotho Bank (LC 48 of 06) [2010] LSLC 38 (25 November 2010)
The Labour Court held it was functus officio and dismissed a renewed bid to re-hear a retrenchment dispute already determined on the same issues.
Explore more
