Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Lesotho decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Min Zhu Enterprise v Ovk Beddyf Bpk (C of A (CIV) 33/2022) [2022] LSCA 47 (11 November 2022)
The Court of Appeal of Lesotho set aside a High Court judgment in a debt-recovery case, holding that procedural unfairness and refusal of a postponement denied a fair trial.
Ovk Bedryf Bpk v Min Zhu Enterprises (Pty) Ltd (CCT/0378/2015) [2022] LSHC 63 (18 August 2022)
Commercial debt-recovery claim over goods sold and delivered. The court held the defendants bore the burden on their payment defence and granted judgment for the plaintiff.
Thotanyana Mining and Civil Works (Pty) Ltd v Master of the High Court and Others (CCT 26 of 14) [2015] LSHC 32 (16 June 2015)
The High Court of Lesotho refused a postponement and directed that the related commercial applications be heard together in one sitting.
Malapane v Mohale and Others (LC/APN 2013) [2015] LSHC 31 (2 March 2015)
The High Court’s Land Court Division held that the second respondent had failed to prosecute her defence after missing court, and allowed the applicant to proceed under Rule 55(2).
Malapane v Mohale and Others (LC/APN 97 of 2013) [2015] LSHC 20 (2 March 2015)
The High Court’s Land Court Division allowed the applicant to proceed because the second respondent failed to attend and prosecute her defence without justification.
St. James ACL High School and Another v Thato Mokhobo Moeletsi and Another (LC/REV 101 of 12) [2014] LSLC 11 (14 February 2014)
The Labour Court of Lesotho reviewed and corrected an arbitration award after finding that refusal of a postponement and ignored evidence caused a grave procedural irregularity.
Eclat Evergood textile Manufactures (Pty) Ltd v Lefu Molefi and Others (LC/REV 99 of 2012) [2013] LSLC 83 (14 October 2013)
The Labour Court of Lesotho refused a postponement and dismissed a review for want of prosecution, reinstating the arbitral award and ordering compliance within 30 days.
South Asia International (Pty) Ltd v Neo Mojalefa and Another (LC/REV 517 of 2006) [2013] LSLC 55 (22 July 2013)
The Labour Court of Lesotho refused a postponement and dismissed a stale review for want of prosecution, leaving the DDPR award in force.
Makhalane v Letseng Diamonds (Pty) Ltd and Another (LC 16 of 12) [2012] LSLC 12 (29 October 2012)
The application was dismissed because the issues raised were found to be lis pendens, as similar matters between the same parties and subject matter were pending before the court. Additionally, the Labour Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the unfair dismissal claim, which should be brought before the DDPR. The application for postponement was also refused due to lack of reasonable grounds.
Source excerpt
Lesotho Highlands Development Authority v Ntene and Others (LC/REV 36 of 10) [2011] LSLC 14 (6 July 2011)
The Labour Court reviewed a DDPR decision refusing a postponement, holding the arbitrator acted unreasonably and denied the applicant a hearing.
Explore more
