In Re Section 65 of The Constitution (2 of 2005) [2006] MWHC 144 (6 November 2006)
Section 65(1) of the Constitution is valid and consistent with other constitutional provisions; it applies only to members of the National Assembly who were members of a political party at the time of election and who voluntarily cease to be members or join another party represented in the Assembly. The section does not apply to independents or sole party representatives, which is discriminatory but requires legislative amendment, not judicial extension.
- Citation
- [2006] MWHC 144
- Parties
- Referror: Attorney General; Amicus: Amicus Curiae
- Court
- High Court of Malawi
- Jurisdiction
- Malawi
- Judgment Date
- 6 November 2006
- Case Number
- 2 of 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Presidential Referral / Determination on Constitutional Interpretation
- Outcome
- Section 65(1) is valid and consistent with the Constitution; its application is limited as interpreted; discriminatory aspects require legislative amendment.
- Legal Topics
- Section 65 of the Constitution, Crossing the Floor, Parliamentary Membership, Political Rights, Freedom of Association
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Referror
Amicus Curiae
Amicus
Procedural Posture
Presidential Referral / Determination on Constitutional Interpretation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Section 65 is consistent with Sections 32, 33, 35 and 40 of the Constitution and is therefore invalid
- 2 Interpretation of 'member of the National Assembly who was, at the time of his or her election, a member of one political party represented in the National Assembly'
- 3 Whether an independent MP joining a political party is deemed to have crossed the floor under Section 65
Ratio Decidendi
Section 65(1) of the Constitution is valid and consistent with other constitutional provisions; it applies only to members of the National Assembly who were members of a political party at the time of election and who voluntarily cease to be members or join another party represented in the Assembly. The section does not apply to independents or sole party representatives, which is discriminatory but requires legislative amendment, not judicial extension.
Court Disposition
Section 65(1) is valid and consistent with the Constitution; its application is limited as interpreted; discriminatory aspects require legislative amendment.
Orders
- Attorney General and Law Commission are called upon to amend Section 65 to address discriminatory aspects.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment