AC(A Minor) acting through Litigation Guardian Mr CJ vs Solomon & 4 others (Civil Cause 162 of 2023) [2025] MWHCCiv 14 (28 October 2025)
A minor girl who becomes pregnant as a result of sexual violence is automatically entitled to access safe termination of pregnancy under section 19(1)(a) and 19(2) of the Gender Equality Act, read with section 243 of the Penal Code, which must be interpreted purposively to include preservation of mental health. The 1st defendant breached statutory duties by denying access and failing to impart necessary information. The 2nd defendant is vicariously liable. The 3rd defendant breached its mandate by failing to promulgate clear guidelines. The 4th defendant breached its statutory duties by failing to enforce and promote access to safe abortion for minors. The claimant suffered loss and is...
- Citation
- [2025] MWHCCiv 14
- Parties
- Claimant: AC (A Minor) acting through Litigation Guardian Mr CJ; 1st Defendant: Mr Jenala Solomon; 2nd Defendant: Blantyre District Council (One Stop Centre at Chileka Health Centre); 3rd Defendant: Attorney General (Minister of Health); 4th Defendant: Human Rights Commission; Amicus Curiae: Centre for Reproductive Health
- Court
- High Court of Malawi Civil Division
- Jurisdiction
- Malawi
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2025
- Case Number
- Civil Cause 162 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claimant's case succeeds; declarations and reliefs granted; costs awarded.
- Legal Topics
- Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights, Abortion Law, Gender Equality, Vicarious Liability, Statutory Interpretation, Mental Health, Children's Rights, Breach of Statutory Duty
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AC (A Minor) acting through Litigation Guardian Mr CJ
Claimant
Mr Jenala Solomon
1st Defendant
Blantyre District Council (One Stop Centre at Chileka Health Centre)
2nd Defendant
Attorney General (Minister of Health)
3rd Defendant
Human Rights Commission
4th Defendant
Centre for Reproductive Health
Amicus Curiae
Procedural Posture
Civil Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was denied termination of pregnancy services by the 1st defendant
- 2 Whether the 2nd defendant is vicariously liable for the 1st defendant’s refusal
- 3 Whether the 1st defendant’s refusal breached sections 19(1)(a), 19(2), and 20(1)(d) of the Gender Equality Act
Ratio Decidendi
A minor girl who becomes pregnant as a result of sexual violence is automatically entitled to access safe termination of pregnancy under section 19(1)(a) and 19(2) of the Gender Equality Act, read with section 243 of the Penal Code, which must be interpreted purposively to include preservation of mental health. The 1st defendant breached statutory duties by denying access and failing to impart necessary information. The 2nd defendant is vicariously liable. The 3rd defendant breached its mandate by failing to promulgate clear guidelines. The 4th defendant breached its statutory duties by failing to enforce and promote access to safe abortion for minors. The claimant suffered loss and is...
Court Disposition
Claimant's case succeeds; declarations and reliefs granted; costs awarded.
Orders
- Declaration that the 1st defendant breached sections 19(1), 19(2), and 20(1)(d) of the Gender Equality Act
- Order that the 2nd defendant is vicariously liable for the actions of the 1st defendant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment