Lilongwe City Council v Mahomed t/a [Price Slashers (Civil Cause 193 of 1993) [1993] MWHCCiv 38 (3 February 1993)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF M/\L/\WI LILONGWE DISTRICT REGJ STRY CIVIL CAUSE NO. 193 OF 1993 BETWEE N: LILONGWE CITY COU NCIL ancl PL td NI I F F S. H. MA HOMED t/a PRI CE SLASHER S ............ . ............. .. IJf f [I\I/J/\1'11 Coram : Jane Mayemu Ansah (Mrs ); Ac tin g Deputy Regi stra r Mvund ula ; of Co unse l f or...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1993] MWHCCiv 38
- Court
- High Court of Malawi Civil Division
- Jurisdiction
- Malawi
- Case Number
- Civil Cause 193 of 1993
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF M/\L/\WI LILONGWE DISTRICT REGJ STRY CIVIL CAUSE NO. 193 OF 1993 BETWEE N: LILONGWE CITY COU NCIL ancl PL td NI I F F S. H. MA HOMED t/a PRI CE SLASHER S ............ . ............. .. IJf f [I\I/J/\1'11 Coram : Jane Mayemu Ansah (Mrs ); Ac tin g Deputy Regi stra r Mvund ula ; of Co unse l f or t he Pl ainti ff Gona ul i nji; of Coun se l fo r t he Def end ant . R U L I N G Tl1is i s t he def endant ' s su mmo ns to set as ide judgement. lt i s d1Jly sup port.eel by an affida vi t . The app li cat ion to set as i de j udgement i s ll aSPd on the defencla nt ' s c l ai m t hat he has a def enc e on t he mer i ts again sL tl1P pla int i ff ' s case . Mr Gonau l i nj i, co unse l f or t he defe nda nt has gi ve n an explan aLion for the defe nda nt ' s de l ay in f ilin g a not i ce of inte ntio n to defend Lhe case . He has sai d t hat se rvic e was ef fec t ed by post . Th e env elope was addressed to t he def enda nt ' s per so nall y. The env e lope reached th e r eg i stered off ice i n t he absen ce of t l1 e def enda nt. He l1 ad ~Jone to Eu r ope on bu s in ess . Mr Gona ulinj i f ur t her states t hat t he defe nda nt has a good defe nce th 0 reforn the defau l t j ud geme nt be set as i de . The app li cat ion 1s stro ngl y opposed by Ul e plcii nt i f f. Mr Mb vun rJ1 lla has submitted t hat the de f enda nt has li ed in hi s expl anat i on for t he 1l0 l ay . The defendant has sa id t l1at t t1 e summo ns was ser ved by post wlie r 0as i I. v111s personal servi ce ancl L1 1e clefe ndant was wi th i n t11 e co untry . th roug h al l the docume r1 ts on t he f il e an d I fin d no aff id avit of se rvi ce . In the abse nce of the aff i da vi t of se rvi ce t here i s not hin g 1 ca n say regardin q t he fact that the def enda nt li ed or not . co ntent ion t hat t he t ime the summo ns r eac hed hi s off i ce he was out of lhn cou ntry . I therefore accept t he def endant' s r l1ave <JorH' 2/ . ..... .. . - - Th e de fend ant 1 s affi da vi t shows t hat t her e are tri ab l e i ssues. there f ore set aside judgeme nt and stay execut i on of t he war ra nt of execution . The def enda nt i s t o pay She ri ff fees i f any, and to se rve his def ence on the pl a i nti ff wi t hin 7 days f r om today 1 s dat e . PRONO UNCED in co ur t t hi s --·--;; V l-' ..,,c-..:.) ............. Day of Ja ne Mayemu An sa h (Mrs ) ACTING DEPUTY REGISTRAR