Cementation Building Contractors v M/S Kims Medical Centre (Civil Cause 1210 of 2006) [2006] MWHC 46 (31 December 2006)
The existence of a bona fide counter-claim and disputed issues regarding the value of work and alleged poor workmanship require a full trial; summary judgment is inappropriate.
- Citation
- [2006] MWHC 46
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Cementation Building Contractors; Defendant: M/S Kims Medical Centre
- Court
- High Court of Malawi
- Jurisdiction
- Malawi
- Judgment Date
- 31 December 2006
- Case Number
- Civil Cause 1210 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Application for Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- application for summary judgment dismissed; leave to defend granted
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Construction Contracts, Counter Claim, Set Off
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Cementation Building Contractors
Plaintiff
M/S Kims Medical Centre
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Application for Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment for unpaid invoices under the construction contract
- 2 Whether the defendant has a bona fide defence or counter-claim sufficient to warrant leave to defend
Ratio Decidendi
The existence of a bona fide counter-claim and disputed issues regarding the value of work and alleged poor workmanship require a full trial; summary judgment is inappropriate.
Court Disposition
application for summary judgment dismissed; leave to defend granted
Orders
- Defendant granted leave to defend
- Costs in the cause
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment