Chikhadzula v Pearl Assurance co. Plc (Civil Cause 244 of 1992) [1992] MWHC 17 (25 May 1992)

Chikhadzula v Pearl Assurance co. Plc (Civil Cause 244 of 1992) [1992] MWHC 17 (25 May 1992)

The application for interlocutory injunction is dismissed because the pleadings do not properly endorse a claim for injunction and damages are an adequate remedy for the alleged breach.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1992] MWHC 17
Parties
Plaintiff: D. M. Chikhadzula; Defendant: Pearl Assurance Co. PLC
Court
High Court of Malawi
Jurisdiction
Malawi
Judgment Date
25 May 1992
Case Number
Civil Cause 244 of 1992
Procedural Posture
Civil Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application
Outcome
Application for interlocutory injunction dismissed with costs; interim injunction extended pending appeal.
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunctions, Performance Bonds, Breach of Contract, Security Interests
Source Language
english
Contract Law Civil Procedure Interlocutory Injunctions Performance Bonds Breach of Contract Security Interests

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

D. M. Chikhadzula

Plaintiff

Pearl Assurance Co. PLC

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application

  1. 1 Whether an interlocutory injunction should be granted to restrain the sale of plaintiff's property
  2. 2 Whether damages are an adequate remedy for the alleged breach
  3. 3 Whether the pleadings properly endorse a claim for injunction

Ratio Decidendi

The application for interlocutory injunction is dismissed because the pleadings do not properly endorse a claim for injunction and damages are an adequate remedy for the alleged breach.

Court Disposition

Application for interlocutory injunction dismissed with costs; interim injunction extended pending appeal.

Orders

  • Application for interlocutory injunction dismissed with costs.
  • Extension of interim injunction granted pending appeal.