Chikhala v Ravat & Anor. (Civil Cause 349 of 2017) [2018] MWHC 876 (10 August 2018)

Chikhala v Ravat & Anor. (Civil Cause 349 of 2017) [2018] MWHC 876 (10 August 2018)

The proceedings were struck out because the plaintiff took no step to prosecute the case for over two years, constituting an abuse of court process under Order 12, r.56 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] MWHC 876
Parties
Plaintiff: Donald Chikhala; 1st Defendant: Yusuf Ravat; 2nd Defendant: Britam Insurance Company Limited
Court
High Court of Malawi
Jurisdiction
Malawi
Case Number
Civil Cause 349 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Cause / Order Striking Out Proceedings for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
Proceedings struck out for want of prosecution
Legal Topics
Striking Out Proceedings, Delay in Prosecution, Abuse of Court Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Striking Out Proceedings Delay in Prosecution Abuse of Court Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Donald Chikhala

Plaintiff

Yusuf Ravat

1st Defendant

Britam Insurance Company Limited

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Cause / Order Striking Out Proceedings for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the proceedings should be struck out for want of prosecution

Ratio Decidendi

The proceedings were struck out because the plaintiff took no step to prosecute the case for over two years, constituting an abuse of court process under Order 12, r.56 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

Court Disposition

Proceedings struck out for want of prosecution

Orders

  • Proceedings struck out
  • Registrar's attention drawn to Order 12, r.58, of CPR