Chikhala v Ravat & Anor. (Civil Cause 349 of 2017) [2018] MWHC 876 (10 August 2018)
The proceedings were struck out because the plaintiff took no step to prosecute the case for over two years, constituting an abuse of court process under Order 12, r.56 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] MWHC 876
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Donald Chikhala; 1st Defendant: Yusuf Ravat; 2nd Defendant: Britam Insurance Company Limited
- Court
- High Court of Malawi
- Jurisdiction
- Malawi
- Case Number
- Civil Cause 349 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Cause / Order Striking Out Proceedings for Want of Prosecution
- Outcome
- Proceedings struck out for want of prosecution
- Legal Topics
- Striking Out Proceedings, Delay in Prosecution, Abuse of Court Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Donald Chikhala
Plaintiff
Yusuf Ravat
1st Defendant
Britam Insurance Company Limited
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Cause / Order Striking Out Proceedings for Want of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proceedings should be struck out for want of prosecution
Ratio Decidendi
The proceedings were struck out because the plaintiff took no step to prosecute the case for over two years, constituting an abuse of court process under Order 12, r.56 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Court Disposition
Proceedings struck out for want of prosecution
Orders
- Proceedings struck out
- Registrar's attention drawn to Order 12, r.58, of CPR
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Donald Chikhala v. Yusuf Ravat and Britam Insurance Company Limited Kenyatta Nyirenda, J. JUDICIARY IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALA WI PRINCIPAL REGISTRY CIVIL CAUSE NO. 349 OF 2017 BETWEEN: DONALD CHIKHALA ( on her own behalf and of the dependants of SAMSON CHIKHALA) ............................. PLAINTIFF -AND- YUSUF RAV AT ..........••.....•...........••.....•.................. 1 ST DEFENDANT BRITAM INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ............... 2ND DEFENDANT CORAM: THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE KENYATTA NYIRENDA Mr. Nanthuru, of Counsel, for the Defendant Mrs. Doreen Mkangala, Court Clerk Kenyatta Nyirenda, J ORDER The present proceedings were commenced on 5th May 2016 by a specially endorsed writ of summons and are in connection with an accident involving motor vehicle registration number TO 3467 Toyota Land Cruiser. On lih May 2016, the Defendants filed an acknowledgement of service of the writ of summons in which they stated their intention to contest the proceedings. The Plaintiff has taken no other step in these proceedings since 5th May 2016. Order 12, r.56, of the Court (High Court) (Civil Procedure) Rules [Hereinafter referred to as "CPR"] comes into play where there is such non-action. The provision is couched in the following terms: Donald Chikhala v. Yusuf Ravat and Britam Insurance Company Limited Kenyatta Nyirenda, J. "The Court may strike out a proceeding without notice, if there has been no step taken in the proceedings for 12 months. " In the present proceedings, more than 2 years have elapsed without the Plaintiff taking further steps to prosecute this case. This is clearly an abuse of court process. I have no option but to strike out the proceedings herein. It is so ordered. In light of the foregoing and by reason thereof, the Registrar's attention is drawn to Order 12, r.58, of CPR. Pronounced in Chambers this 1 oth day of August 2018 at Blantyre in the Republic of Malawi. Kenyatta Nyirenda JUDGE 2