Edwards v Jaenda & Anor. (Misc. Criminal Application 15 of 2017) [2018] MWHC 904 (27 September 2018)

Edwards v Jaenda & Anor. (Misc. Criminal Application 15 of 2017) [2018] MWHC 904 (27 September 2018)

More than 16 months of inaction by the Plaintiff constitutes an abuse of court process and justifies striking out the proceedings under Order 12, r.56 of the CPR.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] MWHC 904
Parties
Plaintiff: Dorothy Edwards; 1st Defendant: Anthony Jaenda; 2nd Defendant: Prime Insurance Company Limited
Court
High Court of Malawi
Jurisdiction
Malawi
Case Number
Misc. Criminal Application 15 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application (civil) / Order on Striking Out for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
Proceedings struck out for want of prosecution
Legal Topics
Striking Out Proceedings, Want of Prosecution, Abuse of Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Striking Out Proceedings Want of Prosecution Abuse of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dorothy Edwards

Plaintiff

Anthony Jaenda

1st Defendant

Prime Insurance Company Limited

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application (civil) / Order on Striking Out for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the proceedings should be struck out for want of prosecution

Ratio Decidendi

More than 16 months of inaction by the Plaintiff constitutes an abuse of court process and justifies striking out the proceedings under Order 12, r.56 of the CPR.

Court Disposition

Proceedings struck out for want of prosecution

Orders

  • Proceedings struck out
  • Registrar's attention drawn to Order 12, r.58, of CPR