Dorothy Matiki v Steven Matiki (Civil Appeal 88 of 2017) [2018] MWHC 1151 (29 May 2018)
The appellate court found no basis to fault the lower court's factual findings or orders, holding that the trial court properly exercised its jurisdiction under section 74 of the MDFR Act 2015 and that the appellant failed to prove her contribution to the acquisition of matrimonial assets.
- Citation
- [2018] MWHC 1151
- Parties
- Appellant: Dorothy Matiki; Respondent: Steven Matiki
- Court
- High Court of Malawi
- Jurisdiction
- Malawi
- Judgment Date
- 29 May 2018
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 88 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Matrimonial Property, Distribution of Assets
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dorothy Matiki
Appellant
Steven Matiki
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the lower court erred in its distribution of matrimonial assets
- 2 Whether the appellant contributed to the acquisition of matrimonial property
Ratio Decidendi
The appellate court found no basis to fault the lower court's factual findings or orders, holding that the trial court properly exercised its jurisdiction under section 74 of the MDFR Act 2015 and that the appellant failed to prove her contribution to the acquisition of matrimonial assets.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Decision of the magistrate court below affirmed
- No order for costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment