DS v AB (Adoption Cause 2 of 2017) [2017] MWHC 94 (23 June 2017)
Filing a second adoption petition at the Principal Registry while a similar petition is pending at Zomba Registry constitutes judge shopping and abuse of court process; procedural irregularities and suppression of material facts warrant striking out the petition.
- Citation
- [2017] MWHC 94
- Parties
- Petitioner: DS; Respondent: AB
- Court
- High Court of Malawi
- Jurisdiction
- Malawi
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2017
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 2 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Ruling on Ex Parte Summons for Abridgement of Time and Petition
- Outcome
- petition struck out; ex parte summons dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Adoption, Abuse of Process, Procedural Irregularity
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DS
Petitioner
AB
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Ruling on Ex Parte Summons for Abridgement of Time and Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petition for adoption at the Principal Registry is procedurally proper given a pending petition at Zomba Registry
- 2 Whether lodging a guardian ad litem report before appointment is irregular
- 3 Whether suppression of material facts regarding previous proceedings constitutes abuse of process
Ratio Decidendi
Filing a second adoption petition at the Principal Registry while a similar petition is pending at Zomba Registry constitutes judge shopping and abuse of court process; procedural irregularities and suppression of material facts warrant striking out the petition.
Court Disposition
petition struck out; ex parte summons dismissed
Orders
- Petition at Principal Registry struck out for abuse of process.
- Ex parte summons for abridgement of time dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment