Chongo v De Cabs Bus Service (Civil Cause 2847 of 2002) [2004] MWHC 32 (31 May 2004)
The plaintiff is entitled to damages for pain, suffering, and loss of amenities due to the serious fracture of the right humerus, ongoing pain, and reduced use of the arm, with quantum guided by comparable cases and adjusted for currency devaluation.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] MWHC 32
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Duncan Chongo; 1st Defendant: De Cars Bus Service; 2nd Defendant: National Insurance Co. Ltd
- Court
- High Court of Malawi
- Jurisdiction
- Malawi
- Case Number
- Civil Cause 2847 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Assessment of Damages Following Default Judgment
- Outcome
- Damages awarded to plaintiff; costs to plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Damages, Negligence, Personal Injury
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Duncan Chongo
Plaintiff
De Cars Bus Service
1st Defendant
National Insurance Co. Ltd
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Assessment of Damages Following Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Quantum of damages for personal injuries resulting from a road traffic accident
- 2 Appropriate compensation for pain, suffering, and loss of amenities
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff is entitled to damages for pain, suffering, and loss of amenities due to the serious fracture of the right humerus, ongoing pain, and reduced use of the arm, with quantum guided by comparable cases and adjusted for currency devaluation.
Court Disposition
Damages awarded to plaintiff; costs to plaintiff.
Orders
- Plaintiff awarded K180,000.00 for pain and suffering
- Plaintiff awarded K65,000.00 for loss of amenities of life
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAWI PRNCIPAL REGISTRY CIVIL CAUSE NO. 2847 OF 2002 BETWEEN: DUNCAN CHONGO …………………………………………PLAINTIFF AND DE CARS BUS SERVICE ……………………………1ST DEFENDANT NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD …………………2ND DEFENDANT CORAM: TEMBO, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Phiri, Counsel for the Plaintiff ORDER ON ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES This is this court’s order on assessment of damages herein. This order is made pursuant to a default judgment dated 8th September, 2003 in favour of the plaintiff. The judgment was entered in favour of the plaintiff for damages for the personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff in an accident in which the plaintiff negligently hit by the defendant’s vehicle whilst he was cycling along the Ntcheu-Balaka road. The notice of hearing of this assessment was duly served on the defendant who chose not to appear at the hearing. That left the plaintiff’s evidence totally unchallenged. In the accident herein, the plaintiff suffered a fracture of the right humerus, the right upper arm. That arm was cast in a plaster of Paris. After the recovery of the fracture, the plaintiff still experiences some pain. He can not use his right arm as he used to before the accident herein. Clearly the plaintiff is entitled to damages for the pain and suffering occasioned by the fracture as well as the treatment thereof. The plaintiff also lost enjoyment of the use of his right arm hence he has lost enjoyment of related amenities of life like manual work. Such damages are aimed at compensating the plaintiff as nearly as possible as money can do see Cassel and Company v Broome [1972] A. C. 1027. And such damages are incapable of quantification in money terms with mathematical precision and so this court seeks guidance on the appropriate level of awards from decided cases of similar nature. See Wright v British Railways Board [1983] A. C. 773. This court has considered the plaintiff’s fracture which was serious took 4 months to heal. This court has also considered decided cases of comparable nature to the instant one. One such case is that of Chirwa v Juma and Prime Insurance Company Ltd Civil cause Number 3794 of 2002 in which a plaintiff who suffered a fractured right arm that healed well without post treatment complications was awarded K65,000.00 damages for pain and suffering in April, 2003. Of course our currency has lost some value since then. This court has considered all the circumstances herein and awards the plaintiff herein K180,000.00 damages for pain and suffering and K65,000.00 damages for loss of amenities of life. Costs are for the plaintiff. Made at Blantyre in Chambers this June, 2004. M A Tembo ASSISTANT REGISTRAR