Cardoso v Chimbende (Civil Cause 408 of 1979) [1979] MWHC 6 (4 September 1979)
The High Court cannot order payment of a debt by instalments unless there is a judgment debt; as no proceedings have commenced and no judgment has been given, the application must be dismissed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1979] MWHC 6
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Fernando da Silva Cardoso; Defendant: M. M. Chimbende
- Court
- High Court of Malawi
- Jurisdiction
- Malawi
- Case Number
- Civil Cause 408 of 1979
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Payment of Debt by Instalments, Jurisdiction, Judgment Debt
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fernando da Silva Cardoso
Plaintiff
M. M. Chimbende
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court can order payment of a debt by instalments absent a judgment debt
- 2 Applicability of Order 20 rule 5 of the Subordinate Courts Rules to High Court proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court cannot order payment of a debt by instalments unless there is a judgment debt; as no proceedings have commenced and no judgment has been given, the application must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- application dismissed with costs to the respondent
- costs to be taxed or agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAWI /- », Kuz < é CIVIL CAUSE NO. 408 OF 1979 BETWEEN: FERNANDO DA SILVA CARDOSO wesoscsssaecoees sovvses. PLAINEIFE and Ma Ms CHIMBENDE cossteccewvreosceecegedeecesecce. DEFENDANT Coram: Skinner, Chief Justice For the Applicant: Fachi of Counsel For the Respondent: Msisya of Counsel Official Interpreter: Nsandu Court Reporter: Brown ORDER "ie a’ This is an application to pay a debt by instalments. It has been brought on behalf of one M. M. Chimbende, erroneously described as the defendant, and Fernando da Silva Cardoso who is described as the plaintiff. There is an affidavit by the applicant in which he admits owing the plaintiff the sum of K22,500, but no writ has been issued by the plaintiff nor is there any other form of originating proceedings issued on his behalf. The High Court has jurisdiction to order the payment of a debt by instalments but only in the case of a judgment debt. This is not a judgment debt. Mr. Fachi who appears for the applicant relies on Order 20 rule 5 of the Subordinate Courts Rules. I do not think that that rule is applicable to proceedings in the High Court other than proceedings by way of appeal from a magistrate's court, but even if the rule was applicable Mr. Fachi's client does not fall within it because it speaks of a debtor against whom judgment has been or is about to be given. In the instant case judgment has not been given. It can hardly be said that it is about to be given because no proceedings have been commenced. I dismiss the application with costs to the respondent, such costs to be taxed or agreed. Pronounced in open court this 4th day of September, 1979, at Blantyre. \ Jo Jo SKINNER CHIEF JUSTICE