Joseph & Anor. v United General Insurance Company Limited (Personal Injury Case 461 of 2018) [2018] MWHC 1153 (4 December 2018)
Damages for loss of expectation of life and dependency are to be assessed using established legal principles and comparable precedents, considering the deceased's age, income, and life expectancy.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] MWHC 1153
- Parties
- Claimant: Elida Joseph; Defendant: United General Insurance Company Limited
- Court
- High Court of Malawi
- Jurisdiction
- Malawi
- Case Number
- Personal Injury Case 461 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Cause / Assessment of Damages Following Consent Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for claimant
- Legal Topics
- Loss of Expectation of Life, Loss of Dependency, Assessment of Damages
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elida Joseph
Claimant
United General Insurance Company Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Cause / Assessment of Damages Following Consent Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 quantification of damages for loss of expectation of life
- 2 quantification of damages for loss of dependency
- 3 costs of the action
Ratio Decidendi
Damages for loss of expectation of life and dependency are to be assessed using established legal principles and comparable precedents, considering the deceased's age, income, and life expectancy.
Court Disposition
judgment for claimant
Orders
- Claimant awarded MK 1,500,000.00 for loss of expectation of life
- Claimant awarded MK 3,168,000.00 for loss of dependency
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF MALAWI IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALA WI PRINCIPAL REGISTRY PERSONAL INJURY CAUSE NO. 461 OF 2018 BETWEEN ELIDA JOSEPH (suing for herself and on behalf of other beneficiaries of the estate of HENRY PIYO .................... .......................... ... ............................... CLAIMANT AND UNITED GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ............................. . DEFENDANT CORAM : Texious Masoamphambe, Deputy Registrar Mr. Kalua, Counsel for the claimant Mr. Jere, Counsel for the Defendant Ms D. Nkangala, Official Interpreter Date of hearing: 8'11 November, 2018 Date of delivery of order on assessment: -1'1, December, 2018 ORDER ON ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION Thi s is thi s court's order on assessment of damages pursuant to a consent judgment obtained on 17th October, 2018 in favour of the claimant. T he claimant is claiming damages for loss of expectation of life of the deceased, loss of dependency on the deceased and cost of the action. Page 1 of 4 The Claimant commenced the present action on 13 111 August, 2018 by way of summons. The Claimant is claiming damages for loss of expectation of life of the deceased, loss of dependency on the deceased and costs of the action EVIDENCE The claimant had two witnesses in the names of Elida Joseph and James Piyo who told the court that they were a Mother and a brother to the deceased respectively. In her evidence, PWl, Elida Joseph, tendered Exhibit JPl, her witness statement, and she adopted it, under oath, in its entirety. Materially, her story was that on 12th March, 2018 Henry Piyo then aged 42 died in a road traffic accident at a place near Lambat Offices along John Chilembwe Highway road when he was hit by a motor vehicle Reg. No. LA 5479, insured by the Defendant. In his evidence, PW2, James Piyo, added that the deceased was getting a monthly salary of K36,000.00 at Sable Farming Limited. As a result of the accident the deceased sustained several injuries and was rushed to Chiradzulu Hospital where he was pronounced dead few minutes later. The accident and resultant death were caused by the negligent driving of the said the vehicle. ISSUE This court is invited to assess the damages payable to the Claimant for loss of expectation of life of the deceased, loss of dependency and cost of the action. THE LAW 1. LOSS OF EXPECTATION OF LIFE. An action for loss of expectation of life is, at law, maintainable on behalf of the estate of the deceased and the prime factor al ways to be kept in mind is the prospect of predominant happy life. This was propounded in the case of Rose v Ford (1937) A. C.826. As rightly pointed out by the Claimant, the award to be made in such an action is arrived at using the same principles used in arriving at claims for personal injuries. Cain v Wilcock (1968) 2 All ER 817 is the case in point. The reason is that loss of life expectation is an aspect that cannot be Page 2 of 4 quantified in monetary terms by use of any known mathematical formula. The prime factor always to be kept in mind is the prospect of a predominantly happy life. This was held in the case of Benham v Gambling (1941) AC 157. In order to provide a comparative basis, this court has considered comparable awards in cases similar to the instant one like the case of Fayiness Nyalungwe v Prime Insurance Company, Civil Cause No 416 of 2013, where the Court awarded Kl, 520,000.00 to the Claimant for loss of expectation of life for the deceased who died at the age of 25. In Chipeto vs Nyirenda, Civil Cause No. 2135 of 2010, the court awarded the Claimant a sum of Mk 1,000,000. 00 as damages for loss of expectation of life. In the case of Annie Chilinga v Duncan Nguluwe, Civil Cause No. 659 of 2011 the court awarded Mk 1,500,000.00 for loss of expectation of life. In respect of the matter at hand and in consideration of the cases cited above, I consider the sum of MK 1,500,000.00 as a reasonable sum and award it for the loss of life expectancy. 2. LOSS OF DEPENDENCY The approach the courts have adopted in arriving at damages recoverable in suits for loss of dependency is that of using what is termed the multiplicand and multiplier formula . The case in point is Mtelera v Sabot Hauliers] 5 MLR 373 and Mallet v McMonagle (1970) A. C. 166, 175. The Multiplicand is the deceased's monthly income whilst the multiplier is the approximated number of years the deceased would have lived if it were not for the wrongful death. The courts have reduced the award under this head by one third representing the portion the deceased would have expected to spend on personal pursuits. You may look at the case of Annie Chilinga v Duncan Nyalungwe, Civil Cause No 659 of 2011. The relevant factor herein is that the deceased died aged 42 and enjoyed a good health life and vigorous life. He had many years to live had it not been for the wrongful death, with the life expectancy pegged at 53.35 as National Statistics Office at \Vww.nsomalawi,mnw puts it. The deceased had all the chances of reaching 53 that is taking into account all the eventualities that life consists of. The deceased had close to 11 years to live if it were not for wrongful death . A close look at several relevant case authorities show that the most relevant factor which the courts have considered in mind when making these awards is the age of the deceased at the time of death. In this present case, the deceased died at 42 years of age and would have lived 11 more years if it were not for the wrongful death. Page 3 of 4 is the award und er this head? Here is the awa rd: MK 36,000.00 x 11 x 12 x 2/3 coming up to MK3,168 ,000.00. The sum of MK MK3 , 168 ,000.00 is, therefore, awarded to the Claimant herein as damages for Joss of dependency. Conclusion In conclusion, therefore, I award the claimant the sum of MK 1,500,000.00 for loss of expectation of life and MK 3, 168,000.00 for loss of dependency. In tota l the claimant is awarded MK4,668,000.00. The defendants are further condemned in costs of this action. Made in chambers this 4th day of December, 2018. Tex&: Ma amphambe DEPUTY REGISTRAR Page 4 of 4