Kazombo v Malawi Electoral Commission (Judicial Review Cause 61 of 2025) [2025] MWHCCiv 13 (22 September 2025)
The application was dismissed due to procedural irregularities, errors, and lack of clarity in the documents submitted.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] MWHCCiv 13
- Parties
- Applicant: Madalitso Fred Kazombo; Respondent: Malawi Electoral Commission
- Court
- High Court of Malawi Civil Division
- Jurisdiction
- Malawi
- Case Number
- Judicial Review Cause 61 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Application for Leave
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Electoral Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Madalitso Fred Kazombo
Applicant
Malawi Electoral Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to commence judicial review against the Malawi Electoral Commission's election decision
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed due to procedural irregularities, errors, and lack of clarity in the documents submitted.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- Application for leave to apply for judicial review is dismissed.
- Liberty granted to refile a properly drafted application and supporting documents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAWI LILONGWE DISTRICT REGISTRY CIVIL DIVISION JUDICIAL REVIEW CAUSE NO. 61 OF 2025 BETWEEN THE STATE On application by MADALITSO FRED KAZOMBO) …………………………….. APPLICANT -AND- MALAWI ELECTORAL COMMISSION ……………………..…… RESPONDENT CORAM: HON. JUSTICE VIOLET PALIKENA-CHIPAO Mr. Oscar Taulo, Counsel for the Applicant Vincent Khombe, Court Clerk and Official Interpreter Chipao, J RULING ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW 1. The Applicant, Mr. Madalitso Fred Kazombo has petitioned this court seeking permission to commence judicial review proceedings against the Malawi Electoral Commission in respect of its decision in relation to the just conducted election whose results we are still waiting. The application for leave is made pursuant to Order 19 rule 20, 21 and 22 as read with rule 13 and 19 of the Courts (High Court) (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter the CPR). 2. Upon going through the application, sworn statement verifying grounds for judicial review and the skeleton arguments in support of the application, the court noted a number of irregularities or errors in the manner in which the documents were prepared including typos, wrong citations of provisions in some respects, unclear arguments and compounding of facts among others. It would appear the application was done in a hurry and without proof such that in some respects, it is difficult to appreciate what Counsel intended to communicate to the court. 3. In this regard, the application cannot be granted. It is dismissed with liberty to refile a properly drafted application and supporting documents if the Applicant so wishes. If the Applicant decides to refile the judicial review proceedings, the application for leave should be made with notice to the Respondent. 4. It is so ordered. Made in Chambers on 22nd day of September, 2025 V. Palikena-Chipao JUDGE