Mapeto DWHSM Ltd v Karim & Ors. (Land Case 22 of 2019) [2019] MWHC 112 (13 May 2019)

Mapeto DWHSM Ltd v Karim & Ors. (Land Case 22 of 2019) [2019] MWHC 112 (13 May 2019)

The interlocutory injunction was vacated because the claimant failed to file the required application for its continuation.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] MWHC 112
Parties
Claimant: Mapeto DWHSM Limited; 1st Defendant: Khalid Abdul Karim; 2nd Defendant: Altaf Sattar; 3rd Defendant: Awo Kassam; 4th Defendant: Commissioner for Lands
Court
High Court of Malawi
Jurisdiction
Malawi
Case Number
Land Case 22 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Land Matter / Order Vacating Interlocutory Injunction
Outcome
interlocutory injunction vacated
Legal Topics
Injunction, Vacation of Injunction, Interlocutory Orders
Source Language
en
Land Law Injunction Vacation of Injunction Interlocutory Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mapeto DWHSM Limited

Claimant

Khalid Abdul Karim

1st Defendant

Altaf Sattar

2nd Defendant

Awo Kassam

3rd Defendant

Commissioner for Lands

4th Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land Matter / Order Vacating Interlocutory Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the interlocutory injunction should continue in the absence of an application for its continuation

Ratio Decidendi

The interlocutory injunction was vacated because the claimant failed to file the required application for its continuation.

Court Disposition

interlocutory injunction vacated

Orders

  • The interlocutory order of injunction herein be vacated.