Mkomba v Phiri (Miscellaneous Civil Application 1 of 2014) [2014] MWHC 499 (10 June 2014)
The stay of execution is granted because the respondent has not demonstrated the means to repay the damages if the appeal succeeds, and denying the stay would render the appeal nugatory and be unjust to the appellant.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] MWHC 499
- Parties
- Appellant: MIR REAM MR OM BA; Respondent: RESUP PIR
- Court
- High Court of Malawi
- Jurisdiction
- Malawi
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2014
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application 1 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- stay of execution granted pending appeal
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Appeal, Damages, Tort of Negligence
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MIR REAM MR OM BA
Appellant
RESUP PIR
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a stay of execution of judgment should be granted pending appeal
- 2 Whether the appeal would be rendered nugatory if stay is not granted
Ratio Decidendi
The stay of execution is granted because the respondent has not demonstrated the means to repay the damages if the appeal succeeds, and denying the stay would render the appeal nugatory and be unjust to the appellant.
Court Disposition
stay of execution granted pending appeal
Orders
- Damages awarded to be paid into court pending outcome of appeal
- Costs to be in the cause
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment