Mutharika and Another v Chilima and Another (MSCA Civil Appeal 47 of 2019) [2019] MWSC 21 (15 August 2019)
The Court found that the issues before it were interlocutory, related to case management and discretion, and there was no reason to interfere with the lower court's decisions. The absence of a Notice of Appeal by the 1st Appellant and the nature of the issues led to dismissal of the matter.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] MWSC 21
- Parties
- 1st Appellant: Professor Arthur Peter Mutharika; 2nd Appellant: Electoral Commission; 1st Respondent: Dr. Saulos Klaus Chilima; 2nd Respondent: Dr. Lazarus McCarthy Chakwera
- Court
- Malawi Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Malawi
- Case Number
- MSCA Civil Appeal 47 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Order on Appealability and Disposition
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs to the respondents
- Legal Topics
- Appeal, Interlocutory Orders, Case Management, Exercise of Discretion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Professor Arthur Peter Mutharika
1st Appellant
Electoral Commission
2nd Appellant
Dr. Saulos Klaus Chilima
1st Respondent
Dr. Lazarus McCarthy Chakwera
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Order on Appealability and Disposition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there are appealable matters under Sections 21 and 23 of the Supreme Court of Appeal Act
- 2 Whether the absence of a Notice of Appeal by the 1st Appellant affects the appeal
- 3 Whether the issues raised were interlocutory and related to case management and discretion
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the issues before it were interlocutory, related to case management and discretion, and there was no reason to interfere with the lower court's decisions. The absence of a Notice of Appeal by the 1st Appellant and the nature of the issues led to dismissal of the matter.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs to the respondents
Orders
- Matter before the Court is dismissed with costs to the respondents
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
i Me ; ae tag: i i ote! A Raf fog . 4 § NARS Nicky —— se Foe ; “taeda, he keg paeaeeaaacrnreiei [7 £57 " Wht alawi Tihiciary ae Wits IN THE MALAWI SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL SITTING AT LILONGWE MSCA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 47 OF 2019 BETWEEN PROFESSOR ARTHUR PETER MUTHARIKA..........csccececees 1ST APPELLANT ELECTORAL COMMISSION................ssscsescocceseesceeseeseeseecees 2ND APPELLANT AND DR. SAULOS KLAUS CHILIMA..............ccccecccsccsccscceeccsees 1ST RESPONDENT DR. LAZARUS MCCARTHY CHAKWERA..........scccscscsereees 2ND RESPONDENT CORAM: THE HON. THE CHIEF JUSTICE A. K. C. NYIRENDA SC HON. JUSTICE E. B. TWEA SC, JA HON. JUSTICE R. R. MZIKAMANDA SC, JA HON. JUSTICE L. P. CHIKOPA SC, JA HON. JUSTICE F. E. KAPANDA SC, JA HON. JUSTICE D. F. MWAUNGULU SC, JA HON. JUSTICE A. D. KAMANGA SC, JA D. Kanyenda/C. Gondwe, Counsel for the 1st Appellant T. Chokhoto/D. Banda, Counsel for the 294 Appellant Dr. C. Silungwe/ M. Mwale, Counsel for the 1st Respondent M. Msisha SC/ T. Mvalo SC, Counsel for the 2n4 Beaponcent W. Shaibu, Judicial Research Officer Minikwa / Masiyano, Court Clerks Chiusiwa/Msimuko, Court Reporter ORDER This is the order of the Court: 1. Are there appealable matters in this case — Yes, there are appealable matters under the provisions of Sections 21 and 23 of the Supreme Court of Appeal Act. 2. We notice that: a) There is no Notice of Appeal filed by the 1st Appellant. b) There is a Notice of Appeal by the 2"¢ Appellant although the issues in the 24 Appellant’s appeal were matters raised by the 1stAppellant, not the 274 Appellant, in the Court below; and c) More importantly, we notice that the issues that were before the Court below related to interlocutory orders, issues of case management and exercise of discretion of the Court which we find no reason to interfere with. 3. Having made these observations, which we will address fully in a formal judgment; having read skeleton arguments and heard oral arguments, further having considered the matter in its entirety, we dismiss the matter before us with costs to the respondents. Pronounced in Open Court at Lilongwe this 15‘ Day of August, 20 LY, a USTICE HON. R. R. MZIKAMANDA SC JUSTICE OF APPEAL HON. L}P. CHIKOPA SC JUSTICE OF APPEAL eo HON. F. E. KAPANDA SC JUSTICE OF APPEAL HON. A. D. KAMANGA SC JUSTICE OF APPEAL peers