Ndala v Plan Malawi & General Alliance Insurance Limited (Civil Cause 297 of 2018) [2021] MWHC 233 (30 November 2021)

Ndala v Plan Malawi & General Alliance Insurance Limited (Civil Cause 297 of 2018) [2021] MWHC 233 (30 November 2021)

The claimant failed to take any step to prosecute the case for over three years, which is an abuse of court process and justifies striking out the proceedings under Order 12, r.56 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] MWHC 233
Parties
Claimant: Enock Ndala; 1st Defendant: Plan Malawi; 2nd Defendant: General Alliance Insurance Limited
Court
High Court of Malawi
Jurisdiction
Malawi
Case Number
Civil Cause 297 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Striking Out for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
proceedings struck out for want of prosecution
Legal Topics
Abuse of Process, Delay in Prosecution, Striking Out Proceedings, Workers Compensation
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Abuse of Process Delay in Prosecution Striking Out Proceedings Workers Compensation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Enock Ndala

Claimant

Plan Malawi

1st Defendant

General Alliance Insurance Limited

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Ruling on Striking Out for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the proceedings should be struck out for want of prosecution due to inordinate delay

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant failed to take any step to prosecute the case for over three years, which is an abuse of court process and justifies striking out the proceedings under Order 12, r.56 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

Court Disposition

proceedings struck out for want of prosecution

Orders

  • The proceedings are struck out.
  • Registrar’s attention is drawn to Order 12, r.58, of CPR.