Phiri v Kachere (Civil Cause 282 of 2016) [2018] MWHC 667 (14 May 2018)
The claimant took no steps to prosecute the case for over 20 months, constituting an abuse of court process and justifying striking out the proceedings under Order 12, r.56 of the CPR. The delay was intolerable and prejudicial to the administration of justice.
- Citation
- [2018] MWHC 667
- Parties
- Claimant: Chinyama M. Taumbe Phiri; Defendant: Martina Kachere
- Court
- High Court of Malawi
- Jurisdiction
- Malawi
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2018
- Case Number
- Civil Cause 282 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Application to Dispense With Mediation and for Further Directions; Determination on Striking Out for Want of Prosecution
- Outcome
- Proceedings struck out for want of prosecution
- Legal Topics
- Striking Out Proceedings, Delay in Prosecution, Mediation Dispensation, Resulting Trust, Duty of Candour
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chinyama M. Taumbe Phiri
Claimant
Martina Kachere
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Application to Dispense With Mediation and for Further Directions; Determination on Striking Out for Want of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether mediation should be dispensed with
- 2 Whether the proceedings should be struck out for want of prosecution
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant took no steps to prosecute the case for over 20 months, constituting an abuse of court process and justifying striking out the proceedings under Order 12, r.56 of the CPR. The delay was intolerable and prejudicial to the administration of justice.
Court Disposition
Proceedings struck out for want of prosecution
Orders
- Proceedings struck out
- Registrar’s attention drawn to Order 12, r.58, CPR
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment