R v Lobo (None) [2016] MWHC 577 (4 October 2016)
The accused was positively identified by a credible eyewitness who knew him by face, and circumstantial evidence corroborated his presence and actions at the scene. The defence of alibi was not credible as no witness could account for the accused's whereabouts at the material time. The doctrine of transferred malice applied, making the accused criminally liable for the death of the deceased even though the intended target was another person.
- Citation
- [2016] MWHC 577
- Parties
- Prosecution: Republic; Accused: Stewart Lobo
- Court
- High Court of Malawi
- Jurisdiction
- Malawi
- Judgment Date
- 4 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment on Conviction
- Outcome
- Conviction
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Identification Evidence, Hearsay, Alibi, Transferred Malice
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Prosecution
Stewart Lobo
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment on Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused was properly identified as the shooter
- 2 Admissibility and reliability of identification and hearsay evidence
- 3 Whether the accused's alibi raises reasonable doubt
Ratio Decidendi
The accused was positively identified by a credible eyewitness who knew him by face, and circumstantial evidence corroborated his presence and actions at the scene. The defence of alibi was not credible as no witness could account for the accused's whereabouts at the material time. The doctrine of transferred malice applied, making the accused criminally liable for the death of the deceased even though the intended target was another person.
Court Disposition
Conviction
Orders
- Accused found guilty of murder contrary to section 209 of the Penal Code
- Bail revoked forthwith
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment