R v Nyasaland (Confirmation Case 269 of 1996) [1996] MWHC 11 (29 February 1996)
Convictions cannot be sustained as there was no evidence of any trick or device deployed by the defendant.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1996] MWHC 11
- Parties
- Prosecutor: The Republic; Accused: Harry Nyasalandi
- Court
- High Court of Malawi
- Jurisdiction
- Malawi
- Case Number
- Confirmation Case 269 of 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Confirmation
- Outcome
- conviction and sentences set aside
- Legal Topics
- Cheating, Conviction Review
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Republic
Prosecutor
Harry Nyasalandi
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Confirmation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction for cheating under section 321 of the Penal Code was proper given the facts
Ratio Decidendi
Convictions cannot be sustained as there was no evidence of any trick or device deployed by the defendant.
Court Disposition
conviction and sentences set aside
Orders
- convictions set aside
- sentences set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAWI PRINCIPAL REGISTRY CONFIRMATION CASE NO. 269 OF 1996 THE REPUBLIC VERSUS HARRY NYASALANDI From the Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court at Zomba Criminal Case No. 274 of 1995 CORAM: MWAUNGULU, J Kalolokesya, State Advocate for the State Accused, present and unrepresented Chilunga, Official Interpreter Mwenyeidi, Recording Officer Mwaungulu J JUDGMENT This case was set down by the Reviewing Judge to consider the propriety of the conviction. The defendant, Harry Nyasalandi, was convicted by the Senior Resident Magistrate at Zomba of the offence of cheating contrary to section 321 of the Penal Code. He was sentenced on each count to fines. The Court also ordered compensation out of the fines. The sentences do not concern us here. It is the conviction which doers. The story on each count is the same. The defendant borrowed cameras from his friends. He has not returned them. The defendant is charged with offences under section 321 of the Penal Code: On the facts there is no evidence of any trick or device deployed. The convictions cannot be sustained. They are set aside and so are the sentences. Made in open Court this 1st day of March 1996 at Blantyre. D. F. Mwaungulu JUDGE