Mtegha v Longwe (Civil Appeal 93 of 1972) [1974] MWNTAC 1 (23 January 1974)
The appellant never entered into marriage with the respondent after her husband's death, and under customary law she is free to marry any other person; therefore, refusal to grant divorce was unjustified.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1974] MWNTAC 1
- Parties
- Appellant: Tifwelemo Mtegha; Respondent: Tayipini Longwe
- Court
- National Traditional Appeal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malawi
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 93 of 1972
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Succession, Marriage Under Customary Law
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tifwelemo Mtegha
Appellant
Tayipini Longwe
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to a divorce under customary law after refusing to marry the deceased husband's elder brother
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant never entered into marriage with the respondent after her husband's death, and under customary law she is free to marry any other person; therefore, refusal to grant divorce was unjustified.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Tifwelemo Mtegha is free to marry any other person
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE NATIONAL TRADITIONAL COURT OF APPEAL SITTING AT MZUZU CASE NO 93 OF 1972 BETWEEN TIFWELEMO MTEGHA …………………………………APPELLANT -VS- TAYIPINI LONGWE………………………………………. RESPONDENT CORAM: THE HON. JUDGE CHIEF MWASE (CHAIRMAN) JUDGMENT The appellant in this case Tifwelemo Mtegha appealed against judgement and an order of refusal to grant her a divorce by the Urban Court at Mzuzu. The husband died in 1967 and she was purported to be succeeded by the elder brother of the deceased who is the respondent. The appellant refused get married to him. Under customary law, if a woman loses her husband though death, she has two choices to do. She can choose a man her late husband family, she could be free and marry another person all together. With the evidence which we have, the appellant refused to marry the respondent soon after her husband died. She never entered into marriage with him. We therefore find no ground why the chairman refused to grant a divorce. The appeal against both Judgment and order is allowed. Tifwelemo Mtegha is free to marry any other person. Order accordingly. DATED THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 1974 AT MZUZU