AKARERE KA NYABIHU vs. GM CIVIL ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS (GM CEC) Ltd.

AKARERE KA NYABIHU vs. GM CIVIL ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS (GM CEC) Ltd.

The Court of Appeal found that both lower courts based their decisions on the same essential grounds: Akarere ka Nyabihu unlawfully terminated the contract without following the required procedure, and the resulting consequences (payment of final account, damages, and denial of guarantee recovery) were consistently...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOMAA 00093/2022/CA
Parties
Appellant: Akarere ka Nyabihu; Respondent: GM Civil Engineering Contractors (GM CEC) Ltd
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
19 April 2023
Case Number
RCOMAA 00093/2022/CA
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal, Second Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed as inadmissible for lack of jurisdiction.
Legal Topics
Contract Termination, Public Procurement Disputes, Appeal Jurisdiction, Damages for Breach of Contract, Procedural Bars to Appeal
Source Language
rw
Contract Law Public Procurement Law Civil Procedure Contract Termination Public Procurement Disputes Appeal Jurisdiction Damages for Breach of Contract Procedural Bars to Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Akarere ka Nyabihu

Appellant

GM Civil Engineering Contractors (GM CEC) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal, Second Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the second appeal by Akarere ka Nyabihu is admissible under Article 52 of Law No. 30/2018 on the jurisdiction of courts
  2. 2 Whether the lower courts based their decisions on the same grounds
  3. 3 Whether Akarere ka Nyabihu lawfully terminated the contract with GM CEC Ltd

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal found that both lower courts based their decisions on the same essential grounds: Akarere ka Nyabihu unlawfully terminated the contract without following the required procedure, and the resulting consequences (payment of final account, damages, and denial of guarantee recovery) were consistently upheld. Therefore, under Article 52(3) of Law No. 30/2018, the second appeal is inadmissible.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed as inadmissible for lack of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • The preliminary objection by GM Civil Engineering Contractors Ltd is upheld.
  • The appeal by Akarere ka Nyabihu is not admitted.