MURINDA vs. MUKAMUZIMA N’ABANDI [

MURINDA vs. MUKAMUZIMA N’ABANDI [

The claim to annul the long-term lease agreement was not administrative but civil in nature, as the dispute centered on family land and the rights of family members, not on an administrative act. The joinder of the Land Authority did not convert the claim into an administrative one. The appeal was therefore...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RADA 00003/2022/HC/NYZ
Parties
Applicant: Alphonse Murinda; Respondent: Mukamuzima Scholastique; Respondent: Nyirabahuye Virginie; Interested Party: Rwanda Land Management & Use Authority
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
28 July 2023
Case Number
RADA 00003/2022/HC/NYZ
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed as inadmissible
Legal Topics
Nature of Claims, Jurisdiction, Land Registration, Family Property, Contract Annulment
Source Language
rw
Civil Law Land Law Family Law Nature of Claims Jurisdiction Land Registration Family Property Contract Annulment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alphonse Murinda

Applicant

Mukamuzima Scholastique

Respondent

Nyirabahuye Virginie

Respondent

Rwanda Land Management & Use Authority

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the claim to annul the long-term land lease agreement is an administrative claim or a civil (family) claim
  2. 2 Whether compensation should be awarded to the respondent

Ratio Decidendi

The claim to annul the long-term lease agreement was not administrative but civil in nature, as the dispute centered on family land and the rights of family members, not on an administrative act. The joinder of the Land Authority did not convert the claim into an administrative one. The appeal was therefore inadmissible, and the lower court's decision was upheld with an increase in the awarded advocate's fees.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed as inadmissible

Orders

  • Lower court decision RAD 00005/2021/TGI/MHG affirmed except for increased advocate's fees.
  • Alphonse Murinda to pay Mukamuzima Scholastique advocate's fees of 1,000,000 RWF (covering both trial and appeal).