Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Rwanda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwemeje ko amasezerano y’ubwumvikane yo ku wa 05/06/2026 asoza urubanza, bityo impaka zari zikiriho zirangizwa.
Urukiko rw'Ubujurire rwemeje ko ikibanza No 531 gisubizwa Saleh Salim Al Farsy, rusanga abaguze nta buryarya ariko ku muntu utari nyiracyo bagomba kwishyurwa n’abagisize.
Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwemeje ko ubujurire bwa kabiri bwa Nkurikiyeyezu Michel butakiriwe kuko yatsinzwe mu nkiko zombi ku mpamvu zimwe.
Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwemeje ko isambu yari yaragabanyijwe mu isaranganya ryo mu 1999, rutegeka ko igabanywamo ibice bibiri kandi rihindura icyemezo cyari cyabanje.
Digest of Court of Appeal precedents on unsigned interview records, confessions, sentencing discretion, proof, testimony, retrials, and related procedure.
The Court of Appeal gave full effect to a settlement signed by all parties on 7 November 2025, terminating the appeal and ordering compliance with the agreed terms.
The Court of Appeal held that Benda Rosine’s second appeal was inadmissible because both lower courts dismissed her claim on the same grounds.
A notarial will is invalid if secrecy is breached by disclosure to a beneficiary before the testator's death, as this contravenes the requirement for confidentiality under Rwandan succession law. In tax matters, a second audit following annulment of the first for procedural errors does not require explicit mention in the annulment decision. In criminal cases, mitigation of sentence is discretionary and must be justified by the court, which is not bound to reduce the sentence even if mitigating factors are present. Confessions and witness statements retain evidentiary value subject to judicial…
Source excerpt
There was no valid settlement agreement between the applicants and SONARWA as required by law, and the limitation period was suspended due to ongoing negotiations. Therefore, the claim was not time-barred and applicants were entitled to pursue compensation.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal held that Rucamihigo had lost on the same substantive ground in both lower courts, so his second appeal was inadmissible for lack of jurisdiction.
Explore more
