BANQUE POPULAIRE DU RWANDA ATLAS MARA Plc v NKUSI

BANQUE POPULAIRE DU RWANDA ATLAS MARA Plc v NKUSI

The Supreme Court held that BPR Atlas Mara Plc was not subjected to injustice in the appellate process, as the grounds for appeal were identical in both lower courts and the issue of SGES/ATT Ltd's intervention did not affect the merits. The revision for injustice was therefore baseless, and the prior judgments...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RS/INJUST/RCOM 00005/2020/SC
Parties
Applicant: BANQUE POPULAIRE DU RWANDA ATLAS MARA Plc; Respondent: NKUSI Evariste; Intervener: SGES/ATT Ltd
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
27 November 2020
Case Number
RS/INJUST/RCOM 00005/2020/SC
Procedural Posture
Commercial Review (revision) for Injustice / Supreme Court Final Judgment
Outcome
Revision for injustice dismissed; prior appellate judgment affirmed
Legal Topics
Cheque Payment Disputes, Standing of Parties, Revision for Injustice, Costs and Attorney Fees
Source Language
rw
Commercial Law Banking Law Civil Procedure Cheque Payment Disputes Standing of Parties Revision for Injustice Costs and Attorney Fees

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

BANQUE POPULAIRE DU RWANDA ATLAS MARA Plc

Applicant

NKUSI Evariste

Respondent

SGES/ATT Ltd

Intervener

Procedural Posture

Commercial Review (revision) for Injustice / Supreme Court Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Supreme Court should revise the appellate judgment for injustice as claimed by BPR Atlas Mara Plc
  2. 2 Whether SGES/ATT Ltd had standing as a party in the revision proceedings
  3. 3 Whether the lower courts erred in not admitting the second appeal and in the treatment of SGES/ATT Ltd's intervention

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that BPR Atlas Mara Plc was not subjected to injustice in the appellate process, as the grounds for appeal were identical in both lower courts and the issue of SGES/ATT Ltd's intervention did not affect the merits. The revision for injustice was therefore baseless, and the prior judgments stand. Costs and attorney fees were awarded to the respondent as the prevailing party.

Court Disposition

Revision for injustice dismissed; prior appellate judgment affirmed

Orders

  • BPR Atlas Mara Plc to pay NKUSI Evariste 800,000 Frw for costs and attorney fees
  • No further relief granted to any party