Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Rwanda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Urukiko rw'Ubujurire rwemeje ko ikibanza No 531 gisubizwa Saleh Salim Al Farsy, rusanga abaguze nta buryarya ariko ku muntu utari nyiracyo bagomba kwishyurwa n’abagisize.
The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against refusal to admit intervention, holding that intervention is unavailable unless the underlying case was decided on the merits and is no longer appealable.
The Court of Appeal allowed the City of Kigali to withdraw its appeal, holding that consent of the other parties was not required and awarding appellate costs.
The Court of Appeal accepted Umujyi wa Kigali’s withdrawal of its appeal and held that the respondents’ cross-appeals would not be heard.
The Court of Appeal held that UBUZIMA Polyclinic Ltd’s second appeal was inadmissible because it had lost in both lower courts on the same grounds.
The Court of Appeal allowed UMUJYI WA KIGALI to withdraw its appeal and held that the dependent incidental appeals could not be examined.
The Court of Appeal held it lacked jurisdiction over a second appeal because the disputed property value, excluding expropriated land, fell below 75,000,000 Frw.
The Court of Appeal held that the second appeal was not admissible because no lower court had awarded damages of at least 75,000,000 Frw.
The Court of Appeal held that Kayirangwa Immaculée’s second appeal was inadmissible because she had lost in both lower courts on the same grounds.
The appeal was not based solely on the clarification decision but sought to challenge the principal judgment after the statutory appeal period had expired. The law does not permit using clarification or correction as a means to reopen appeal of the main judgment after the deadline. Therefore, the appeal was inadmissible for being out of time.
Source excerpt
Explore more
