UBUSHINJACYAHA vs NTAKIRUTIMANA ALIAS BEBI

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs NTAKIRUTIMANA ALIAS BEBI

The appellate court found that the evidence relied upon by the lower courts—primarily the minor's statements and the fact that she was found at the accused's house—was insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The absence of medical evidence and lack of corroborative facts created reasonable doubt, requiring acquittal under the law.

Citation
RPAA01014/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Accused: Ntakirutimana alias Bebi
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
29 May 2025
Case Number
RPAA01014/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; acquittal entered
Legal Topics
Burden of Proof, Standard of Proof, Sexual Offences, Child Protection, Appeals, Evidence Assessment
Source Language
rw

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Ntakirutimana alias Bebi

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Ntakirutimana alias Bebi was convicted of defilement of a minor without evidence proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt

Ratio Decidendi

The appellate court found that the evidence relied upon by the lower courts—primarily the minor's statements and the fact that she was found at the accused's house—was insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The absence of medical evidence and lack of corroborative facts created reasonable doubt, requiring acquittal under the law.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; acquittal entered

Orders

  • The appeal of Ntakirutimana alias Bebi is allowed.
  • The judgment of the High Court, Rwamagana Chamber, in RPA01047/2021/HC/RWG is overturned.