UBUSHINJACYAHA vs MUREKEZI N’UNDI

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs MUREKEZI N’UNDI

A deceased person lacks legal capacity to appeal; only successors may appeal, and must do so in their own names and interests. An appeal filed in the name of the deceased is inadmissible and cannot be regularized. The appeal by Irto Mattia (deceased) was not accepted for lack of capacity and standing.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RP 00004/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Accused: Murekezi Guy; Accused: Ghirini Guido; Civil Claimant (deceased): Irto Mattia; Successor of Civil Claimant: Nahimana Grace; Civil Claimant: Verfaille Raymond
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
28 November 2024
Case Number
RP 00004/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed as inadmissible for lack of capacity; objection upheld.
Legal Topics
Capacity to Sue, Succession, Appeal Procedure, Party Substitution After Death
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Capacity to Sue Succession Appeal Procedure Party Substitution After Death

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Murekezi Guy

Accused

Ghirini Guido

Accused

Irto Mattia

Civil Claimant (deceased)

Nahimana Grace

Successor of Civil Claimant

Verfaille Raymond

Civil Claimant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether a deceased person can validly lodge an appeal through a successor in the deceased's name
  2. 2 Whether appeals must be made in the name and interest of the successor, not the deceased

Ratio Decidendi

A deceased person lacks legal capacity to appeal; only successors may appeal, and must do so in their own names and interests. An appeal filed in the name of the deceased is inadmissible and cannot be regularized. The appeal by Irto Mattia (deceased) was not accepted for lack of capacity and standing.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed as inadmissible for lack of capacity; objection upheld.

Orders

  • Objection by Murekezi Guy and Ghirini Guido upheld.
  • Appeal by Irto Mattia (deceased) not admitted for lack of capacity.