CAPLAKI v. MUKANYIRINKWAYA_en
The voluntary intervention of Kigali City is admissible before the Supreme Court as it was not a party in previous proceedings and has a legitimate interest; such intervention does not change the nature of the case from commercial to administrative because the subject matter remains reimbursement arising from a sale contract.
- Citation
- RLR V.2-2018
- Parties
- Appellant: CAPLAKI; Respondent: Mukanyirinkwaya Adèle; Voluntary Intervener: Kigali City
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Rwanda
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2016
- Case Number
- RCOMAA0043/14/CS
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Appeal / Preliminary Objection on Voluntary Intervention Before Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Preliminary objection overruled; voluntary intervention of Kigali City admitted; hearing on merits to continue.
- Legal Topics
- Voluntary Intervention, Jurisdiction, Nature of Claim, Sale of Immovable Property
- Source Language
- en, rw
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CAPLAKI
Appellant
Mukanyirinkwaya Adèle
Respondent
Kigali City
Voluntary Intervener
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Preliminary Objection on Voluntary Intervention Before Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the voluntary intervention by Kigali City is admissible
- 2 Whether the voluntary intervention changes the nature of the case from commercial to administrative
Ratio Decidendi
The voluntary intervention of Kigali City is admissible before the Supreme Court as it was not a party in previous proceedings and has a legitimate interest; such intervention does not change the nature of the case from commercial to administrative because the subject matter remains reimbursement arising from a sale contract.
Court Disposition
Preliminary objection overruled; voluntary intervention of Kigali City admitted; hearing on merits to continue.
Orders
- Kigali City is allowed to voluntarily intervene in the case.
- Hearing on merits to continue on 12/07/2016.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment