GAHIGA Marie Thérèse v GAHIGA Ange

GAHIGA Marie Thérèse v GAHIGA Ange

The enforcement of RCE 240/2016, which was granted exequatur in Rwanda, must be suspended because the underlying foreign judgment was set aside by a subsequent appellate decision (RCEA 002), and the exequatur of this latter judgment is still pending. Continuing enforcement would be contrary to the requirement that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOM 00001/2022/CA
Parties
Applicant: GAHIGA Marie Thérèse; Respondent: GAHIGA Ange
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
11 February 2022
Case Number
RCOM 00001/2022/CA
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Interlocutory Application for Interim Relief
Outcome
Application allowed
Legal Topics
Exequatur of Foreign Judgments, Interim Measures, Urgency in Civil Procedure, Enforcement of Judgments
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Private International Law Exequatur of Foreign Judgments Interim Measures Urgency in Civil Procedure Enforcement of Judgments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

GAHIGA Marie Thérèse

Applicant

GAHIGA Ange

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Appeal / Interlocutory Application for Interim Relief

  1. 1 Whether the enforcement of judgment RCE 240/2016 (exequatur) should be suspended pending the outcome of proceedings regarding the exequatur of judgment RCEA 002

Ratio Decidendi

The enforcement of RCE 240/2016, which was granted exequatur in Rwanda, must be suspended because the underlying foreign judgment was set aside by a subsequent appellate decision (RCEA 002), and the exequatur of this latter judgment is still pending. Continuing enforcement would be contrary to the requirement that only final and conclusive foreign judgments may be enforced. The urgency is established by the risk of irreparable harm to the applicant if her property is sold before the substantive issue is resolved.

Court Disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • The enforcement of judgment RCE 240/2016 (exequatur) in case RCOMA 00001/2020/CA is suspended provisionally.
  • The security for costs deposited remains with the State Treasury.