UBUSHINJACYAHA v MUNYAMPUNDU

UBUSHINJACYAHA v MUNYAMPUNDU

The appeal lacked merit as Munyampundu was properly notified of charges, evidence from credible witnesses established his presence and participation in killings during the genocide, and procedural requirements were met. The conviction and sentence were affirmed.

Citation
RPAA/GEN 00003/2022/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Appellant/defendant: Munyampundu Léon alias Kinihira
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
12 December 2025
Case Number
RPAA/GEN 00003/2022/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed
Legal Topics
Genocide, Evidence Assessment, Procedural Fairness, Group Crimes, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law International Criminal Law Genocide Law Genocide Evidence Assessment Procedural Fairness Group Crimes Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Munyampundu Léon alias Kinihira

Appellant/defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Munyampundu was convicted for new acts not previously defended against
  2. 2 Whether conviction for genocide was based on unreliable evidence
  3. 3 Whether the trial court ignored the defendant's defense

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal lacked merit as Munyampundu was properly notified of charges, evidence from credible witnesses established his presence and participation in killings during the genocide, and procedural requirements were met. The conviction and sentence were affirmed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed

Orders

  • Munyampundu Léon alias Kinihira remains convicted of genocide
  • 25-year prison sentence upheld