UBUSHINJACYAHA vs. HABYARIMANA
The court found that Habyarimana Jean, as MRND president for Kigali and a national political bureau member, participated in selecting and training Interahamwe youth, attended and led meetings that incited violence against Tutsi, and supported the distribution of weapons used in the genocide. The court held that these acts constituted conspiracy to commit genocide and being an accessory to genocide, but found insufficient evidence that he personally led roadblocks where Tutsi were killed. The court rejected the unlawful detention claim as not affecting the merits and held that the charges were not time-barred as they related to genocide, which is imprescriptible.
- Citation
- RPA GEN 00002/2016/HCCI
- Parties
- Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Appellant/accused: Habyarimana Jean
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Rwanda
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2017
- Case Number
- RPA GEN 00002/2016/HCCI
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / High Court Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal partially allowed; convictions varied
- Legal Topics
- Genocide, Conspiracy to Commit Genocide, Accessory to Genocide, Criminal Procedure, Evidentiary Law
- Source Language
- rw
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ubushinjacyaha
Prosecution
Habyarimana Jean
Appellant/accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / High Court Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Habyarimana Jean was unlawfully detained and whether this affected the proceedings
- 2 Whether new evidence was improperly introduced on appeal
- 3 Whether Habyarimana Jean participated in forming and training the Interahamwe militia
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Habyarimana Jean, as MRND president for Kigali and a national political bureau member, participated in selecting and training Interahamwe youth, attended and led meetings that incited violence against Tutsi, and supported the distribution of weapons used in the genocide. The court held that these acts constituted conspiracy to commit genocide and being an accessory to genocide, but found insufficient evidence that he personally led roadblocks where Tutsi were killed. The court rejected the unlawful detention claim as not affecting the merits and held that the charges were not time-barred as they related to genocide, which is imprescriptible.
Court Disposition
Appeal partially allowed; convictions varied
Orders
- Conviction for conspiracy to commit genocide and being an accessory to genocide affirmed
- Conviction for leading roadblocks where Tutsi were killed overturned
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment