KHALID v. AHMED ET AL

KHALID v. AHMED ET AL

Tierce opposition (third-party opposition) is not admissible against final Supreme Court judgments in Rwanda, as the law only allows for revision (recours en révision) or correction/clarification in limited circumstances. The applicant's claim was therefore inadmissible.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RC 0002/09/CS
Parties
Applicant: Khalid Foz; Respondent: Ahmed Abdulatif; Respondent: Assini Omar; Respondent: Ali Fikirini; Respondent: Succession Yussuf Bin Abdulaziz
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
19 March 2010
Case Number
RC 0002/09/CS
Procedural Posture
Civil / Supreme Court Application for Tierce Opposition (extraordinary Appeal)
Outcome
Application dismissed as inadmissible.
Legal Topics
Tierce Opposition, Finality of Supreme Court Judgments, Extraordinary Remedies, Jurisdiction of Supreme Court
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Tierce Opposition Finality of Supreme Court Judgments Extraordinary Remedies Jurisdiction of Supreme Court

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Khalid Foz

Applicant

Ahmed Abdulatif

Respondent

Assini Omar

Respondent

Ali Fikirini

Respondent

Succession Yussuf Bin Abdulaziz

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Supreme Court Application for Tierce Opposition (extraordinary Appeal)

  1. 1 Whether a tierce opposition (third-party opposition) is admissible against a final Supreme Court judgment under Rwandan law.

Ratio Decidendi

Tierce opposition (third-party opposition) is not admissible against final Supreme Court judgments in Rwanda, as the law only allows for revision (recours en révision) or correction/clarification in limited circumstances. The applicant's claim was therefore inadmissible.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed as inadmissible.

Orders

  • The application by Khalid Foz to oppose Supreme Court judgment RCAA 0006/08/CS is not admitted.
  • Khalid Foz is ordered to pay 12,500 Rwandan francs in court costs within 8 days, failing which the amount will be forcibly recovered.