Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Rwanda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal held that no appeal or tierce opposition lies against a judgment revised for injustice, and dismissed the appeal.
The High Court held that tierce opposition was inadmissible against a judgment rendered on review for injustice, and awarded costs to Uwineza Jacqueline.
The High Court held that a judgment rendered on extraordinary review for injustice is final and cannot be challenged by tierce opposition or any other means of appeal or review. The applicant's claim was therefore inadmissible.
Source excerpt
The Supreme Court of Rwanda held that tierce opposition is not admissible against its final judgments, and dismissed Khalid Foz’s application.
Explore more
